USAF’s 2020 Accidents Include A-29 Crash That Disabled Airman

USAF’s 2020 Accidents Include A-29 Crash That Disabled Airman

When an A-29 light attack plane crashed in Afghanistan last summer, the U.S. military reassured the public that its pilot had ejected and was rescued. But the reality was more complicated.

The unidentified Airman, an American flying an Afghan Air Force Super Tucano as part of the U.S. training mission in the country, is now permanently, partially disabled, according to Air Force Safety Center data obtained by Air Force Magazine. The A-29 was destroyed after suffering from what initially seemed to be mechanical issues.

Air Education and Training Command, the organization in charge of the training wing the pilot belonged to, declined to provide more details about the pilot’s condition or what the Airman is doing now.

“Because it was an Afghan A-29, the Air Force did not have the lead for the accident investigation,” AETC spokesperson Marilyn C. Holliday said. “The Air Force did complete a safety investigation, which is not releasable.”

The July 9, 2020, incident is one of the 72 total aviation accidents that occurred in the Air Force over the course of fiscal 2020. Air Force Magazine on Feb. 19 obtained more details of those mishaps, some of which were not made public at the time. The data is current as of Feb. 16.

Statistics show the Air Force is “continuing the generally decreasing trend of aviation Class A mishaps over the last 10 years,” the service said.

But the most destructive accidents have not tapered off nearly as much as the Air Force might like, given its push to improve maintenance and training protocols, while those that caused lesser damage also rose.

Thirteen of the 72 total accidents caused injury or death, according to an Air Force Magazine analysis. Accidents are broken down into flight mishaps, flight-related mishaps, and ground operations mishaps.

Twenty-nine Class A aviation mishaps occurred in fiscal 2020, including 23 incidents involving manned aircraft and six involving unmanned aircraft. Those numbers are slightly higher than the 26 mishaps in fiscal 2019, but nearly on par with the 10-year average of 31 accidents, the Air Force Safety Center said. The service has seen 29 mishaps a year on average over the past five years, the center added.

Class A incidents are those in which Defense Department aircraft are destroyed or total more than $2.5 million in damages, or where a person is killed or permanently, fully disabled.

Seven people died as a result of aviation accidents between Oct. 1, 2019, and Sept. 30, 2020, the Air Force said. Fourteen aircraft were destroyed in that time period as well. Both figures are slightly lower than the five- and 10-year averages.

For Class B accidents, the Air Force saw 39 manned aircraft mishaps and four unmanned mishaps, totaling 43 incidents. That’s a jump from 36 Class B accidents in the previous year—about the same as the five-year average of 45 accidents per year, but lower than the 10-year average of 49.

“Overall, statistics tend to fluctuate from year to year, so the service looks at trends within the data to see if there are significant changes and, more importantly, to determine if there are common issues,” the Safety Center said in a statement to Air Force Magazine.

F-22 fighter jets saw the most severe problems most often, with five Class A mishaps over the course of fiscal 2020. A-10s, C-17s, and F-15s tied for the most Class B mishaps. Among unmanned aircraft, the MQ-9 Reaper logged seven Class A and B crashes in that time.

Among the previously unreported Class A mishaps:

  • Oct. 13, 2019: A C-17 from the Tennessee Air National Guard’s 164th Airlift Wing suffered engine damage after shutting down because of “high exhaust gas temperature” upon startup in Delaware. No injuries were reported.
  • March 31, 2020: A C-17 with the 62nd Airlift Wing in Kuwait suffered turbine damage because of a similar “high exhaust gas temperature” problem, but safely returned to base. No injuries were reported.
  • May 1, 2020: An F-22 at the 1st Fighter Wing at Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Va., saw an engine stall shortly after takeoff, causing the plane to shut down in flight. The fighter jet returned to base and no injuries were reported.
  • July 14, 2020: An F-22 at the 325th Fighter Wing at Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla., incurred damage to the right engine because of foreign object debris. No injuries were reported.
  • July 24, 2020: An F-22 suffered a hydraulic fire during ground operations at the 325th Fighter Wing. No injuries were reported.
  • July 26, 2020: A B-1 at the 28th Bomb Wing at Ellsworth Air Force Base, S.D., sucked a cable into an engine during a maintenance run, causing significant engine damage. No injuries were reported.
  • Aug. 19, 2020: A C-17’s onboard inert gas generating system caught fire during takeoff, injuring the plane and three people at the 60th Air Mobility Wing at Travis Air Force Base, Calif.

The Air Force also recorded six Class A incidents involving unmanned aircraft, including one on July 24, 2020, where an unnamed drone was completely destroyed in a crash while controlled by an Air Force Special Operations Command unit in an undisclosed location. It’s possible that aircraft could be a secretive RQ-170 reconnaissance drone or any others kept out of the public eye.

MQ-9 Reapers comprised the rest of the most severe incidents. One “intentional ditching” over Somalia in June 2020 led to a total aircraft loss for the 432nd Wing out of Creech Air Force Base, Nev. That same month, the New York Air National Guard saw another MQ-9 damaged when it lost thrust upon takeoff and left the runway.

Reapers were completely destroyed in August 2020 in an unknown location while flying for the 27th Special Operations Wing, and in September 2020 in Kuwait while flying for an undisclosed unit. Another MQ-9 at Holloman Air Force Base, N.M., was damaged upon takeoff on Sept. 2, 2020, as well.

Nineteen types of airframes, from the A-10 to the CV-22, were involved in Class B mishaps over the course of the year. Their woes span engine fires, bird strikes, foreign object debris, and more.

Class B events meet at least one of these criteria: they incur damages costing between $600,000 and $2.5 million; cause a permanent, partial disability; or lead to inpatient hospitalization of at least three personnel.

An MQ-9 in Jordan was “struck by [a] vehicle” when taxiing, causing major damage to both the drone and the vehicle, according to the Air Force. The lower hatch of a U-2 spy plane’s camera bay fell off the aircraft mid-flight. Multiple F-16 fighter jets were “damaged in weather” in South Korea, the same day a typhoon brought heavy rain to parts of the country, but landed without incident.

One B-1 bomber from the 7th Bomb Wing in Nevada saw an electrical malfunction in flight that sent smoke into the cockpit, then blew out a tire upon landing. On one unfortunate day for an A-10 in Georgia last April, the aircraft’s gun malfunctioned, its engine was damaged, its “canopy departed,” and it landed with its landing gear up—but no injuries were reported.

The Safety Center also shed more light on the XQ-58 Valkyrie crash in October 2019 that rendered the prototype “Skyborg” drone temporarily unusable. The Valkyrie experienced “several failures” while trying to land during a test in Arizona, causing “severe structural damage.”

“In final descent, the prototype cushion system, which was employed for the initial test series but is not intended for ultimate operational use, suffered an anomaly resulting in the aircraft sustaining damage upon touchdown,” Valkyrie manufacturer Kratos said, according to Inside Defense.

The wingman drone returned to flight testing in January 2020.

Not all entries in the list provided by the Air Force included damage costs; those that did totaled nearly $29 million. The bulk of that cost, $23.6 million, comes from a C-130J’s hard landing in Germany in April 2020. It is slightly more expensive than the $21 million in damage cited in the Air Force’s accident investigation for the event released Feb. 16.

The Air Force has already incurred at least five Class A mishaps so far in fiscal 2021, including the Feb. 19 T-38 crash in Alabama that killed 23-year-old 1st Lt. Scot Ames Jr. and a Japanese student pilot.

“We are a close-knit family and the loss of our teammates affects us all,” said Col. Seth Graham, commander of the 14th Flying Training Wing—the same wing to which the now-disabled A-29 pilot belonged. “The strength of our bond is what will help us get through it together.”

Read the entire list of fiscal 2020 accidents here.

Air Combat Command Issues Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan

Air Combat Command Issues Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan

Air Combat Command is pursuing four lines of effort to enhance diversity and inclusion among its force, according to an excerpt from its newly issued Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan, obtained by Air Force Magazine on Feb. 19. The plan, which has not been publicly released, was issued the same day.

“These lines of effort provide the framework for advancing diversity and inclusion and for building measures of accountability to ensure the enterprise attracts and leverages elite talent from diverse communities to compete and win for the nation,” the excerpt stated. The LOEs are also meant to give the command’s D&I professionals “a strategic outlook” to help them devise future operational plans and quantify the command’s progress and performance, it added. 

Firstly, ACC wants to overhaul its “organizational culture and climate” to cultivate inclusion across all of its “environments, programs, policies, processes, and procedures,” and nix any aspects of the command’s culture and/or way of doing business that might impede diversity and inclusion, the excerpt explained. This priority entails making sure the command’s “vision and strategy” for enhancing D&I lines up command priorities, pinpointing “artificial” obstacles to these goals, enabling open conversations so all voices can feel valued, and changing up the way ACC communicates within and outside of the command to make it clear that D&I is “an operational imperative,” according to the excerpt.

During a Feb. 19 interview with Air Force Magazine, inaugural ACC Diversity and Inclusion Officer Rachel Castellon said this means “recognizing that we need to be inclusive, and we need to do it in an enduring kind of way through the communications that we have, through review of our policies, our procedures, [and] the way that we set up our environments and programs.”

Secondly, the command looks to work diversity and inclusion into the way it attracts, recruits, develops, and evaluates uniformed personnel and civilians, as well as into how it chooses people for jobs, the excerpt said. This line of effort includes identifying “diversity gaps in ACC career fields and ACC key leadership positions and methods to ensure consideration of all talent prior to hiring,” and committing “fully to promoting ACC career fields, especially to fill high demand, low density specialties,” the command wrote.

“As you know, with Air Combat Command, we have a lot of the … operational side, and so we have to look really closely at how our representation falls there, and then what can we do to make it more reflective of American society, ’cause that’s where, you know, obviously, we get our Airmen,” Castellon said. 

Thirdly, the excerpt said, the command aims to make sure that its “training environments reflect and defend diversity and inclusion,” and that leaders and troops understand why these values are vital to national security. This line of effort entails teaching Airmen how different issues “relating to culture, ethnicity, class, race, and gender” are connected, teaching command employees and leaders how to cultivate and keep up “a diverse and inclusive culture,” and working in D&I principles into the command’s “community engagement and organizational collaboration” to make its operations more effective, the command wrote.

Since ACC must “be enticing” to Americans who are job-hunting, but who want to feel confident that an organization’s culture is healthy before taking the leap and applying for an opportunity, Castellon said “education and training will help” the command make sure Airmen know both USAF’s and ACC’s stances on caring for Airmen in terms of diversity, inclusion, and equity.

Lastly, ACC is focused on making sure the progress it makes will last, the excerpt explained. This final line of effort includes creating an enterprise-wide D&I infrastructure “to build institutional stability,” figuring out “metrics and measures” the command can use to assess the performance and impact of its diversity and inclusion efforts, and evaluating its “talent management and organizational culture to maximize ACC’s ability to translate increased diversity and improved inclusion,” the excerpt said.

“We have to think in terms of infrastructure and long term talent management, and how are we gonna retain the quality folks that we bring in, because it isn’t just bringing them in, it’s keeping them as well, and taking good care of their families, because obviously, that makes a huge difference to Airmen,” Castellon said.

USAF Identifies Pilot Killed in T-38 Crash

USAF Identifies Pilot Killed in T-38 Crash

The USAF pilot killed in the Feb. 19 T-38C Talon crash near Montgomery, Ala., is 1st Lt. Scot Ames Jr., 23, the Air Force said Feb. 22.

Ames and a student pilot from the Japan Air Self-Defense Force were killed when the Talon crashed near Dannelly Field as part of a multi-leg training mission originating from Columbus Air Force Base, Miss. The JASDF has not identified the student pilot yet, and the name will be provided “according to Japan’s established process,” the 14th Flying Training Wing said in a statement.  

Ames, from Pekin, Ind., was an instructor pilot with the 50th Flying Training Squadron at Columbus.

“We are a close-knit family and the loss of our teammates affects us all,” said Col. Seth Graham, 14th Flying Training Wing commander, in the statement. “The strength of our bond is what will help us get through it together. My thoughts and prayers are with their families, friends, and our teammates today.”

The Air Force is investigating the cause of the crash. The 14th FTW halted flying operations following the incident.

“Our Air Force investigators are performing their time-tested process used to investigate mishaps like this, and they will ensure the integrity of the investigation,” Graham said. “The Air Force is committed to providing the safest working environment for its people. The safety of our people and the surrounding communities is our foremost concern.”

The incident was the second involving a T-38 within days, after a Talon from Beale Air Force Base, Calif., made a gear-up landing in Mather, Calif., on Feb. 18. No one was injured in the incident. The Feb. 19 crash is the first fatal T-38 mishap since two USAF pilots from Vance Air Force Base, Okla., were killed when their Talons collided on Nov. 21, 2019.

AFA’s Virtual Aerospace Warfare Symposium Starts Feb. 24

AFA’s Virtual Aerospace Warfare Symposium Starts Feb. 24

The Air Force Association’s virtual Aerospace Warfare Symposium kicks off Feb. 24, opening three days of non-stop activity featuring 40 panels and presentations and the top leaders from the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Space Force.

Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. will provide the keynote on Feb. 24. Other sessions feature:

  • The top enlisted leaders from the Air Force, Space Force, and Joint Chiefs of Staff discuss “Leading in a Time of Change”
  • The Space Force’s Chief Scientist joins top leaders from Air Force Materiel Command, the Space and Missile Systems Center, and the Air Force Research Laboratory to explore “Science, Technology, and Innovation in Every Domain”
  • Industry leaders join Air Force and Space Force experts to delve into a dozen mission domains, from aircraft and space platforms to joint all domain command and control.

Noted astrophysist Neil DeGrasse Tyson will join Chief of Space Operations Gen. John W. “Jay” Raymond to headline Day 2, and Acting Secretary of the Air Force John P. Roth anchors Day 3. The theme of the symposium is Accelerate and Innovate.

Check out the full Attendee Guide or click here to register.

New this year are 15 Mission Domain Engagement Sessions, which will be live, interactive webinars. The all-new Mission Domain Hub provides an easily accessible means to access images, videos, and white papers, and more from dozens of sponsors.

Stay tuned to www.airforcemag.com for updates throughout the show, and follow us on social media @airforcemag.

People Tried to Breach Air National Guard Bases at Least 13 Times This Year

People Tried to Breach Air National Guard Bases at Least 13 Times This Year

As of the morning of Feb. 19, the Air National Guard had recorded 13 breaches—including attempted and successful intrusions—at its installations since the start of 2021, ANG Director Lt. Gen. Michael A. Loh told Air Force Magazine in an interview that day. However, ANG declined to disclose the locations of the breaches due to operational security concerns.

Of the 13 incidents, nine occurred at “installation-control points,” and none caused damage, Loh said. 

“Most of ’em come in, they don’t realize that they’re coming on a base, that they’re supposed to stop, and they pass through,” he said.

In “a couple” of these cases, however, individuals attempted “to jump the fence and steal stuff,” though base defenders apprehended them, he added.

The news comes as the Air Force Office of Inspector General is pursuing an investigation into a Feb. 4 breach at Joint Base Andrews, Md., as well as a review of security at all USAF and Space Force installations worldwide. Acting Air Force Secretary John P. Roth and USAF Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. ordered both inquiries, Air Force Magazine previously reported.

Loh acknowledged that installation breaches are “a problem,” but praised ANG defenders—whom he said vet 8 million base visitors each year—as “doing amazing things.” He added that civilian-military cooperation and on-base security technology help enhance security at ANG installations.

“Here’s the good news: In combination with local law enforcement, in and around our locations, because we are United States-based, I get that extra layer that’s outside the fence, as well as the layer that’s inside the fence,” Loh said. “… If you follow the standard operating procedures, and you’re able to do some things like we have with other intrusion detection systems, like cameras and those types of things, we are actually very secure, and people will feel very secure being in our base.”

Citizen-Airmen and community members who raise their voices when they “see something that’s just not right” collectively serve as security “sensors,” making threat awareness part of the local culture at ANG installations, he added.

ANG drilling includes training on both base intrusions and inside threats, he said.

According to Loh, this combination of factors works to make ANG bases “very secure locations.”

Security Forces Training Incident Prompts Investigation at Little Rock AFB

Security Forces Training Incident Prompts Investigation at Little Rock AFB

The 19th Airlift Wing at Little Rock Air Force Base, Ark., launched an investigation after a 19th Security Forces Squadron Airman discharged their weapon into a classroom wall during a Feb. 14 “dry-fire training,” wing spokesperson 1st Lt. Jessica M. Cicchetto wrote in a Feb. 19 email to Air Force Magazine.

These trainings let defenders practice employing their weapons and marksmanship basics, she explained.

“During this training event, a live round was discharged and traveled into a wall,” she wrote. “There were no injuries or fatalities reported.”

The investigation aims to figure out what caused the discharge and how to stop this kind of incident from happening again, Cicchetto said.

The popular, but unofficial, Air Force amn/nco/snco Facebook page first shared a report of a “negligent discharge” at the base on Feb. 14.

The incident comes amid an Air Force Inspector General review of security at all Air Force and Space Force installations around the globe, which Acting Air Force Secretary John P. Roth and USAF Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. ordered following a Feb. 4 breach at Joint Base Andrews, Md.

30 Years After Desert Storm: Feb. 23

30 Years After Desert Storm: Feb. 23

In commemoration of the 30th Anniversary of Operation Desert Storm, Air Force Magazine is posting daily recollections from the six-week war, which expelled Iraq from occupied Kuwait.

Feb. 23:

  • B-52s pound Iraqi positions.
  • Iraqis set 100 more Kuwaiti oil wells on fire.
  • The total number of coalition attack sorties flown during the air war reaches 94,000.
  • U.S. Central Command boss Gen. H. Norman Schwarzkopf Jr. determines the attrition of Iraqi combat effectiveness is sufficient for a successful ground offensive with few casualties.

Check out our complete chronology of the Gulf War, starting with Iraq’s July 1990 invasion of Kuwait and running through Iraq’s April 1991 acceptance of peace terms.

Decision to Base US Space Command Headquarters in Alabama Under Review

Decision to Base US Space Command Headquarters in Alabama Under Review

The Department of Defense Office of Inspector General will review the Department of the Air Force’s decision to base U.S. Space Command headquarters at Redstone Arsenal, Ala., according to a Feb. 19 memo.

The choice of the Army’s Redstone Arsenal—green-lighted provided it passes an environmental review—has already raised objections.

Business groups and elected officeholders from Colorado released statements in January and February criticizing the selection, questioning why the process was stopped and then restarted, and claiming they had inside information that former President Donald J. Trump had personally intervened, slighting their state.

The review will gauge how well the Air Force “complied with DOD and Air Force policies during the location selection process; used objective and relevant scoring factors to rank the six candidate locations; and calculated costs and other scoring factors accurately and consistently,” Assistant Inspector General Randolph R. Stone wrote in the memo addressed to Acting Secretary John P. Roth.

The military’s 11th combatant command, which was created in 2019, is provisionally based at Peterson Air Force Base, Colo., until a permanent headquarters is named. Peterson was home to Air Force Space Command until that command formed part of the Space Force during the organizational reshuffling to create the new service. Once it’s fully stood up, U.S. Space Command could amount to about 1,500 jobs, though it’s unclear how many of those jobs will be new hires or have been formerly part of the Air Force command.

Local officials and outside experts have characterized the new command as moving from its long-established home. And, Colorado’s odds seemed pretty good at first.

Four of the six finalists announced in the first list, released under Secretary Heather Wilson in May 2019, were in Colorado. Redstone Arsenal and Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif., were the other two locations. Wilson left office the same month.

About a year later, Air Force Secretary Barbara M. Barrett announced the Air Force was re-opening the process. Defense Secretary Mark T. Esper said at the time that he wanted to wait until after the November election to announce a selection so the choice wouldn’t be perceived as political.

Twenty-four states turned in nominations, and by November, the Air Force announced a new list of six finalists. Bases in Florida, Nebraska, New Mexico, and Texas replaced three in Colorado and the one in California. Peterson was the lone Colorado base that persisted.

Barrett announced Redstone Arsenal as the preferred location in January. Since then, the selection has evolved into a political tug-of-war, with both sides taking aim at the Air Force’s methodology.

U.S. Rep. Michael Waltz (R-Florida) shed light on the reboot of the selection process in a December 2020 interview with Central Florida’s Spectrum News.

“‘Are you kidding me? Florida is out of the running for a space command?’” Waltz recalled thinking when the first list was released. “Myself, the governor, our senators [and] a lot of our local officials started asking a lot of tough questions about how this decision was made, what’s the process,” said Waltz, an Army veteran. He called the later reversal “huge huge.”

In response to the latest news of the OIG review, U.S. Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-Colorado) called the second selection process “fundamentally flawed” with “defective methodology” that focused on “bean-counting,” according to Feb. 19 statement. He previously criticized the process after having a chance to review “scores,” saying he perceived “significant irregularities in how the metrics were graded.”

Lisa Landes, a spokesperson for the Colorado Springs Chamber of Commerce, said at the time Redstone Arsenal was named that “sources at the White House and the Air Force have confirmed” that the Air Force’s site selection team recommended Peterson but “President Trump ignored their recommendation and selected Redstone Arsenal.”

The Department of the Air Force plans to make its final decision on the headquarters in spring 2023.

30 Years After Desert Storm: Feb. 22

30 Years After Desert Storm: Feb. 22

In commemoration of the 30th Anniversary of Operation Desert Storm, Air Force Magazine is posting daily recollections from the six-week war, which expelled Iraq from occupied Kuwait.

After a brief letup caused by bad weather, heavy air attacks resume in and around Basra—a supply gateway to Kuwait—and against Republican Guard positions along the Iraqi­-Kuwaiti border.

An E-8A Joint STARS, orbiting over Saudi Arabia, detects a large convoy moving toward Kuwait, and vectors an AC-130 gunship and two A-10s to attack. They destroy 58 of 71 vehicles in the convoy.

Scud hits Tel Aviv, destroying 20 buildings, killing three and injuring 96.

DOD reports US has lost nine aircraft, Britain two, and Italy and Kuwait one each. Coalition forces have shot down 17 Iraqi aircraft.

Check out our complete chronology of the Gulf War, starting with Iraq’s July 1990 invasion of Kuwait and running through Iraq’s April 1991 acceptance of peace terms.