Army Building Up New Space Operations Branch

Army Building Up New Space Operations Branch

The Army has long been dependent on space capabilities to navigate terrain, communicate in hard-to-reach areas, and identify and strike targets. Now, the service wants to deepen its space operations expertise and is making plans to expand its own cadre of operators in the coming years.

In June, the service established its a Space Operations Branch, consolidating space-related career paths and created to train Soldiers to operate and deploy space systems.

This week, during the annual Association of the U.S. Army Annual Meeting in Washington, after transverring 600 enlisted Soldiers into the branch Oct. 1, Army officials predicted the Space Operations Branch will eventually include thousands of officers and troops.

The 600 transfers were reclassified as 40D Tactical Space Operations Specialists, the Army’s Military Occupational Specialty code for space troops—uniting them with 40A Space Operations Officers. The enlisted Soldiers had previously been temporarily reassigned to space-related units from Air Defense Artillery, Signal, and Military Intelligence fields.

Speaking with reporters Oct. 14 during the conference, Col. Joseph Mroszczyk, director of the Army’s Transformation Integration Directorate for Space Superiority and High Altitude, said the service’s space operations cadre has almost doubled since 2012, and he expects that to continue within the new Space Operations Branch.

“When we talk about the branch and the targets, having a couple thousand dedicated folks within the branch, between the enlisted and the officer side, is a significant contribution across the service,” Mroszczyk said when asked if the Army has a target level of growth for the branch. He didn’t offer more specifics on how long it might take the service to get there.

After the Space Force was created in 2019, space operators and units transferred from the Air Force, Navy, and Army, with the bulk of Space Force operators coming from the Air Force. Army officials have continued to make the case that they need to have their own space-focused Soldiers. While critics charge that this risks duplicating effort and blurring roles and missions, the Army says the difference is that while the Space Force is focused on maintaining space superiority in orbit, its role is integrating space capability and effects into tactical multidomain operations from the ground.

Lt. Gen. John Rafferty, commander of the Army’s Space and Missile Defense Command, told Air & Space Forces Magazine in an Oct. 13 interview that as demand for these capabilities grows, the Army needs to provide the same professional pathways and training for space operators that it does for other specializations, like artillery, infantry, and aviation.

“Training, education, experience, and talent management is how you create great leaders, and that’s how you build great units with great leaders,” Rafferty said. “It became apparent to the Army that in order to capitalize on the momentum, the gains that we’ve made in Army space-delivered capabilities, we need to professionalize the branch and do it fast.”

Rafferty highlighted a few areas where the Army expects to need more space personnel and effects in the coming years.

The service on Oct. 8 activated its a new Multi-Domain Task Force at Fort Carson, Colo., one of four elements stationed around the world and designed to integrate air, land, sea, space, and cyber operations in theater. A fifth is slated for activation in 2028. Each task force incorporates space effects, and Rafferty said that as the service adds more MDTFs, it will naturally need more space personnel and systems.

He also pointed to the creation of a new Theater Strike Effects Group at U.S. Army Pacific, which will require space support. The service also wants to expand the focus of its 1st Space Brigade—headquartered at Fort Carson, but distributed across six countries—beyond GPS, theater missile warning, and satellite communications into new capability areas. He did not provide details.

As for space systems, the Army hasn’t revealed plans to field its own satellites, but Rafferty and others said the service has an interest in building out an architecture of stratospheric platforms in the “near-space” region—between 60,000 and 100,000 feet in altitude.

“That’s a—no pun intended—space that is just ripe with potential, and the opportunities for various payloads to be on those is remarkable right now,” Rafferty said. “It’s affordable and scalable, and we’ve just got to really pursue that as part of the space branch growth.”

Mroszczyk described the region as a sort of transition point between the air and space domains where platforms could host a variety of payloads supporting missions like sensing and communications, and even serve as platforms for “launched effects”—the Army’s term for small, air- or ground-launched autonomous systems.

As an example, Mroszczyk said high-altitude platforms could form a “complementary” layer for some of the Space Force’s data transport efforts, like the Space Development Agency’s Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture or the Space Data Network. Systems in that layer could help distribute data during a conflict and provide resiliency should space systems be targeted.

He told reporters the Army is looking at a range of systems—from smaller platforms to larger balloons—and is planning multiple experiments in the coming year.

“That operational space allows some persistence and broad coverage in an area where you can deliver space-like capabilities in terms of payloads, but then also take advantage of the deep access that you get from a stratospheric balloon,” he said.

USAFA Board Calls for Opening Part of Long-Closed Chapel

USAFA Board Calls for Opening Part of Long-Closed Chapel

The U.S. Air Force Academy’s Board of Visitors wants the service academy to partially reopen its iconic chapel ahead of schedule next year when it sheds the “big white box” that has enclosed it through years of renovations.

The idea is one of more than a dozen recommendations the board made in its semiannual report released Oct. 15, ahead of a planned Oct. 16 meeting.

The Cadet Chapel, designed by architect Walter Netsch Jr. and opened in 1962, is a National Historic Landmark, renowned for its use of tetrahedrons and its 17 spires. But it has been closed since 2019 for repairs due to leaks and water damage. Originally expected to cost $158 million and to be completed by 2023, renovation costs more than doubled to $335 million due to asbestos removal, among other problems, and the job won’t be finished until 2028.

The chapel has been enclosed in the “the box,” as cadets call it, for seven years. Locals and alums describe the scene as an “eyesore” and President Donald Trump has decried the troubled project, saying last October, “this mess should be investigated.”

A formation of U.S. Air Force Academy cadets stand at attention with the enclosed Cadet Chapel in the background in 2023. U.S. Air Force photo by Craig Z. Rodarte

At one point, officials feared the renovations wouldn’t be complete until spring 2029. But this summer, the Air Force Civil Engineer Center announced the box would start coming down in August 2027 and be fully deconstructed by January 2028. Chaplains will be allowed back in around April 2028, and the building will fully reopen to the public in August 2028. The news was hailed by local media.

USAFA’s Board of Visitors—a congressionally mandated oversight committee—called the new timeline “highly commendable,” but the board argues more can be done.

The board is “deeply concerned that the spiritual and character development of an entire generation of future officers is being compromised by the extended renovation timeline of the Cadet Chapel,” the report states. Members want to reopen the lower level of the chapel by December 2027, even as work continues on the upper level.

A white paper attached to the report makes the case that removing “the box”is a “strategic opportunity” to give cadets at least some access to the building, reorienting the eyesore to its spiritual purpose. To make that happen, the paper argues for:

  • Accelerating the removal of the box by one month
  • Prioritizing repairs and renovations for the lower level
  • Creating “safe and isolated” access points for cadets to enter and exit the lower level
  • Updating any legal and administrative frameworks to support the effort

The lower level of the building hosts Catholic and Jewish chapels, while the upper level has a Protestant chapel. The white paper argues that the lower chapels “can be dynamically time-shared” while the upper chapel is finished to “provide an immediate, centralized home for worship for all faith groups across the cadet wing.”

Assignments and Accreditation

Other Board of Visitors’ recommendations touch on USAFA’s role as an academic institution. One recommendation calls for the Air Force to “elevate the value” of an officer assignment to USAFA as a “career-enhancing duty” for Air Force and Space Force officers.

“While the Board fundamentally considers instructing and working at USAFA to be a premier developmental assignment, Career Field Managers are often reluctant to promote this duty,” the board report states. “Most positions at USAFA are not career-field-specific and therefore CFMs must ‘release’ officers to perform these duties. Career field management teams frequently view these releases as a ‘tax’ and perceive them negatively, as the individual is temporarily leaving their primary specialty.”

The issue is common to special duties such as recruiting, which also takes Airmen and Guardians out of their career field. To overcome the problem, the board wants the academy and Air Force Personnel Center to incentivize Academy duty by rewarding personnel who take USAFA assignments. They also recommend the Air Force examine promotion rates for officers who served as instructors to see whether the assignments improve or hurt career advancement.

More than 2,000 Airmen and Guardians work at USAFA, in jobs ranging from faculty to administration and support roles. In recent times, the number of uniformed faculty has grown as more military instructors have arrived in the wake of a rash of departures by civilian staff spurred by cuts to the federal workforce.

The exodus of civilian staff last year led one alumnus to file a complaint with the Higher Learning Commission, the academy’s accrediting institution. The complaint was settled without affecting the school’s accreditation. Meanwhile, the board report is calling for USAFA to sever its relationship with the HLC and instead join the other service academies and the Air Force’s other degree-granting institutions—including the Air Force Institute of Technology and Air University—to band together under a single accreditor.

A board working group favor joining the new Commission for Public Higher Education, founded by six states’ public university systems whose political leaders argue the new commission is needed to combat liberal bias and burdensome bureaucracy among current accreditors. The working group says CPHE “guarantees an apolitical baseline and alignment with requirements specific to the military education system.”

Previous Recommendations

The Board of Visitors is chaired Rep. August Pfluger (R-Texas), a former by former F-22 pilot and academy alumnus. The boarfd’s previous report, released in February, called for the academy to grow its cadet wing by 10 percent and build a new “tri-complex” of buildings to house a new “Air, Space, and Cyber Education Center,” including a new “home” base for the U.S. Space Force.

The bulk of the recommendations in that February report remain open, awaiting action from Congress. Decisions could come in the 2027 National Defense Authorization bill, but the measure remains stalled and will not be resolved until after the midterm elections.


F-35 Drops 8 Bombs in Quick Succession During ‘Ripple’ Test

F-35 Drops 8 Bombs in Quick Succession During ‘Ripple’ Test

The Marine Corps recently conducted its first-ever “ripple” release of eight Small Diameter Bomb IIs from an F-35B, a key early step in proving out the capability for all F-35 variants.

A “ripple release” refers to munitions all being released in one pass instead of multiple go-arounds. Marine aviators from the Marine Operational Test and Evaluation Squadron 1 at Yuma Proving Ground, Ariz., conducted the test Sept. 15, retired Air Force Maj. Gen. Jon Norman, Raytheon’s vice president for air and space systems, told Air & Space Forces Magazine.

SDB II, also called “StormBreaker,” is a 250-pound, low-yield, precision-guided munition that can hit moving targets in all weather conditions at ranges of at least 46 miles. It is a joint effort between the Air Force and Department of the Navy and is built by RTX’s Raytheon.

While software and other issues have delayed fielding StormBreaker on the F-35, the “ripple” capability could be critical to the Lockheed Martin-made stealthy fighter down the line, Norman argued.

“From a pilot perspective, it’s nice because you’re not sitting there exposing yourself when you have eight targets to address,” he said.

It also eliminates the need to do hands-on weaponeering for each bomb.

“You address the entire target set, so it’s less workload in the cockpit, and you’re able to achieve an effect that I think the pilots are really going to appreciate,” Norman said.

The networked missiles can also be confined to a defined kill box to ensure they strike only a specific area on the battlefield.

“We’re able to set boundaries,” Norman said. “So, you give it a kill box, and it’ll exclude everything outside of that and only hit within that kill box.”

The GBU-53 Small Diameter Bomb, “Stormbreaker,” on the F-15E Strike Eagle. (Air Force)

That’s a key upgrade for the StormBreaker compared to what the bomb is replacing—cluster munitions. SDB II was developed to give pilots an option to replace legacy-era cluster munitions following the 2008 DOD policy directive, which set a 2019 deadline to stop using the area-saturation weapons that had high failure rates and could produce swaths of unexploded ordnance on battlefields.

So, a pilot could spot a boat swarm, quickly set the parameters, and then launch eight 250-pound missiles to destroy the mini-fleet in one pass, Norman said.

“Through automated target recognition software that’s built into it, we can hit prioritized threats,” Norman said. “So, if one fails or one gets shot down, then they just reorder the prioritization.”

F-35 Tests

Low-rate initial production on the StormBreaker started in 2015, and the Air Force cleared the bomb to go on its “objective” aircraft, the F-15E, in 2020. But the service hopes to integrate the munition onto many more platforms, including the F-35A. The Navy, meanwhile, cleared the SDB II to go on its F/A-18E/F this February, though its objective aircraft remains the F-35B and C.

But while the F-15 and F/A-18 carry the StormBreaker externally, the F-35 uses its internal weapons bays to maintain stealthiness, offering a new wrinkle to the ripple release process. The F-35B has the smallest internal capacity of the variants, to accommodate the fan that enables vertical landings.

The next ripple release test is planned for this quarter over a small range in Texas, Norman said.

“We’ll take those results then to the Air Force and to the Navy and the Marines and say, “we’ve demonstrated this capability, is this something you’re interested in?’” Norman told Air & Space Forces Magazine.

Future tests could include striking moving targets at sea with multiple munitions, Norman said—a particularly relevant capability, given reports of swarming boat attacks by the Iranian military in the Strait of Hormuz.

As Raytheon works on refining the “ripple eight” capability for operational use, the F-35 fleet is awaiting rolling software patches to fully incorporate the StormBreaker into its arsenal.

A July report from the Government Accountability Office noted that “SDB II initial capability on the F-35 is delayed 2 years, and program officials said that it might be delayed 2 more years due to F-35 software development issues.”

The F-35 fleet has undergone its third technology refresh, or TR-3, which upgraded the L3Harris core processor, replaced the aircraft’s memory storage unit, and installed multicore processors. But while a “truncated” version of TR-3 was completed in 2025, the fleet is still getting software patches to continue upgrades.

“Development on TR-3 was completed in 2025,” Lockheed Martin spokesperson Mireya Villarreal told Air & Space Forces Magazine in an email. “We continue to build on this baseline through the Block 4 modernization program, which implements upgrades including additional weapons, electronic warfare capabilities and improved sensor technology to ensure the warfighter can defeat any threat.”

GBU-53 stormbreaker
Raytheon Technologies’ StormBreaker® smart weapon is a guided, gliding precision munition with a tri-mode seeker that allows it to track moving targets in low-visibility conditions such as darkness, poor weather and battlefield smoke and dust. Courtesy of Raytheon

StormBreaker’s Future

in addition to the ripple release test, Norman said Raytheon is working to extend the StormBreaker’s 46-mile range by exploring engine efficiencies and design work on the bomb’s body.

“We don’t want to constrain pilots,” Norman said. “We want to give them their full operating envelope to be able to release this.”

At the program’s inception, the Pentagon planned to acquire 21,160 StormBreakers, but that figure has now risen to 31,800, according to the GAO report

“Last year we produced and delivered 1,500 StormBreakers. This year we’re increasing that,” Norman said. He could not provide specific numbers for this year’s deliveries.

“But it’s a significant increase, and we have capacity in the factory to increase more,” he said.

ACC Mulls Commercial Counter-Drone Services for Air Base Defense

ACC Mulls Commercial Counter-Drone Services for Air Base Defense

Air Combat Command is looking for defense firms capable of providing a private counter-drone service, complete with the personnel to operate it, for defending air bases across the Air Force.

ACC, which oversees the service’s Point Defense Task Force, is conducting a market survey to identify companies specializing in counter-small unmanned aerial systems defense technology that can provide “C-sUAS as a Service,” according to an Oct. 13 solicitation.

According to the solicitation, the intent of the service model is to:

  • Provide organic, resilient, sustainable, and agile Point Defense capabilities across Department of the Air Force installations
  • Implement a flexible, scalable architecture allowing installations to scale operational capacity up or down based on dynamic threat levels
  • Leverage mature, commercially available or rapidly adaptable systems rather than initiating high-risk developmental programs

The market survey comes as the Air Force races to develop an arsenal of capabilities to defend its installations against drone threat.

“The Government envisions an initial prototype deployment at two designated Continental United States Air Force installations, with option mechanisms to scale across additional ACC installations upon proven performance,” the document states.

Interested firms have until Oct. 31 to respond to the solicitation. ACC is interested in companies that can provide technology for detecting, tracking, and identifying drones—ranging from small quadcopters to larger, Group 3 systems like the Iranian Shahed one-way attack drones that weight up to 1,320 pounds—at distances of up to five miles from a base perimeter, the document states.

Firms should also be capable of incorporating “government-approved kinetic and/or nonkinetic” effectors that range from radio frequency jamming to directed-energy such as lasers and high-powered microwave systems, the document states. Interested defense firms would also have to show they would continuously refresh software and hardware “within a multiyear service contract without frequent contract modifications,” according to the document.

ACC would also want a commercial capability to have the built-in logistical support to be self-sufficient for up to 96 hours, the document states.

The concept would require the contractor to “provide a complete, integrated, turn-key service solution covering materiel, personnel, training, sustainment, and ongoing modernization,” the solicitation states.

It’s unclear how this commercial service would align with the service’s intent to create a new point defense career field for enlisted Airmen, training and equipping them to defend air bases from drone and missile attack. The Air Force is slated to start designating Airmen with the new specialty within two years. As a short-term fix, the service has established point defense flights, specialized units of roughly 20 Airmen each, trained to rapidly deploy to hotspots and defend air bases against drone attacks.

Currently, the Air Force is equipping installations with the Small Unmanned Air Defense Systems, or SUADS, for countering drones. The system is capable of identifying and tracking enemy missiles or drones of multiple sizes, and downing incoming drones with an electronic warfare weapon. To stop missiles, it uses both electronic warfare and kinetic effectors. It can also interface with commercial counter-drone systems and other air defense systems, depending on the needs of a commander.  

The service is also acquiring additional counter-drone systems through the Pentagon’s Joint Interagency Task Force 401. In the future, counter-drone technology will fall under the “point defense weapon system,” a classification to manage multiple counter-drone systems that range from sensors, radars, and command and control architecture to kinetic and non-kinetic effectors for disabling or destroying incoming drones.

Air Force May Buy Land for 120 New Sentinel ICBM Silos

Air Force May Buy Land for 120 New Sentinel ICBM Silos

The Air Force may wind up buying land to build 120 new intercontinental ballistic missile silos as part of its revamped infrastructure approach for the new Sentinel ICBM.

The service revealed that and other new details about its Sentinel plans as it announced the start of an environmental impact analysis meant to supplement the program’s original review, which was completed in 2023.

The environmental impact statement released in March 2023 cleared a key procedural hurdle in the Air Force’s effort to replace the aging Minuteman III with the Sentinel across three bases in the western U.S.: F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyo.; Malmstrom Air Force Base, Mont.; and Minot Air Force Base, N.D. But much has changed since that EIS—in early 2024, critical cost and schedule overruns for Sentinel triggered a notice to Congress and a Pentagon review under the Nunn-McCurdy Act.

The program’s issues are not caused by the missile, but rather by the massive infrastructure and civil engineering work needed to build the systems it requires, officials say. The Air Force had hoped to reuse much of the infrastructure that supported Minuteman, but analysis showed much of it was too old or too expensive to upgrade.

Eventually, Pentagon leaders certified the Sentinel program to continue. But in an effort to control costs, Air Force officials decided in spring 2025 it would be more effective to build entirely new silos instead of reusing the old ones. There are 450 active Minuteman silos, which the Air Force plans to replace on a one-for-one basis.

At the time, a spokesperson told Air & Space Forces Magazine that the new silos would be “predominantly Air Force-owned real estate, which means reusing the existing missile sites but not the 55-year-old silos.”

A new website associated with the supplemental environmental impact analysis, launched Oct. 9, states that just over a quarter of the sites could be on land not currently owned by the Air Force, with the service considering:

  • Acquisition of land and construction of up to 30 new launch silo sites around F.E. Warren
  • Acquisition of land and construction of up to 30 new launch silo sites around Malmstrom
  • Acquisition of land and construction of up to 60 new launch silo sites around Minot

Additionally, the service said it is evaluating old sites at Malmstrom formerly operated by the 564th Missile Squadron, now inactive, to reuse for up to 60 new launch silo sites.

The Air Force is planning to buy up to 12 acres per silo, according to the supplemental EIS website.

Launch Centers

Silos aren’t the only ICBM infrastructure getting a refresh in the Air Force’s latest plan for Sentinel.

Currently there are 45 missile alert facilities across the three bases where Airmen stay on watch 24/7. The original plan for Sentinel called for building new “launch centers” to command and control the ICBMs at 24 of those facilities and razing the rest.

The new EIS website states that the Air Force will reutilize Missile Alert Facility sites for Launch Centers “where feasible,” but at Minot specifically, officials are considering “construction of new launch center sites in previously undeveloped areas,” the website states. Each Launch Center would have a footprint of up to 16 acres.

Another new consideration is the construction of a “purpose-built Operations Group Facility” at Malmstrom.

Timeline

Now that the Air Force has announced its plans to craft a supplemental EIS, there is a 30-day public “scoping” period where federal, state, and local agencies, interested organizations, and members of the public can all provide comments on the proposed actions.

After that, the service will release a draft of its supplemental EIS, and there will be another window for public comments. The Air Force plans to release its draft by fall 2027.

A final supplemental EIS is scheduled for release in spring 2028, after which the Secretary of the Air Force can sign a Record of Decision, clearing the way for the acquisition of land and construction.

After that, it will be several more years before Sentinel is in the ground—the current Air Force estimate is for the new missile to reach initial operational capability by the early 2030s.

For now, though, the Air Force and contractor Northrop Grumman are already building a prototype silo for Sentinel at Northrop’s Promontory, Utah, facilities.


Air Force Searching for Next-Gen Perimeter Air Defense Radars

Air Force Searching for Next-Gen Perimeter Air Defense Radars

The Air Force is looking to replace the three-decade-old radar warning system that protects the coastlines and borders of the United States and a few remote locations.

A Sept. 21 notice from the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center seeks sources for new technology to continue the Air Route Surveillance Radar-4’s mission and potentially improve its technology.

The notice’s details are classified, but AFLCMC updated the original notice Oct. 13, according to Sam.gov.

The number of radars needed to replace the 44-radar network and the price for those replacements has not yet been determined and will come via market research, Air Force Materiel Command spokesperson Mark Wyatt told Air & Space Forces Magazine.

There is also no development timeline publicly available, though responses to the sources sought notice are due by Oct. 21.

The Air Route Surveillance Radar system version 4, or ARSR-4, long-range radar, Paso Robles, Calif. (Air Force photographer Deb Henley)

Wyatt said AFLCMC is requesting an instrumented range of 250 nautical miles, identical to the current ARSR-4.

ARSR-4 helps operators distinguish aircraft or potential missile threats from other radar “clutter,” which is more prevalent at lower altitudes. While historically the radar has been very effective at this task, newer additions to the cluttered landscape, namely wind farms, can distort the radar’s ability to “see” clearly.

“Wind farms are one of many sources of clutter that any solution would have to address,” Wyatt said. “The Air Force is not prescribing any technique to solve this long-standing challenge for radars.”

Interested industry parties can continue to pair their replacement option with the existing Monopulse Maintenance Surveillance Radar or replace that radar with another solution, Wyatt said.

The MMSR works with the ARSR-4 to “interrogate” aircraft transponders it detects by sending out coded radio frequency pulses that the transponder then responds to.

Using the monopulse method, the MMSR can determine an aircraft’s azimuth from a single pulse received from the transponder, instead of needing multiple hits when sweeping the area.

The MMSR is mounted on the ARSR-4, and they rotate together as they monitor the skies.

ARSR-4 Locations

  • Ajo, Ariz. 
  • Bootlegger Ridge, Mont. 
  • Bucks Harbor, Maine 
  • Caribou, Maine 
  • Cross City, Fla. 
  • Deming, N.M. 
  • Eagle Peak, Texas 
  • Empire, Mich. 
  • FAA Academy (Training Site), Okla. 
  • Falls City, Ore. 
  • Finley, N.D. 
  • Fort Fisher, N.C. 
  • Fort Green, Fla. 
  • Gibbsboro, N.J. 
  • Jedburg, S.C. 
  • King Mountain, Texas 
  • Lake Charles, La. 
  • Lakeside, Mont. 
  • Makah, Wash. 
  • Melbourne, Fla. 
  • Mica Peak, Wash. 
  • Mill Valley, Calif. 
  • Morales, Texas 
  • Mount Kaala, Hawaii 
  • Mount Laguna, Calif. 
  • Key West, Fla. 
  • Nashwauk, Minn. 
  • North Truro, Mass. 
  • Oceana Naval Air Station, Va. 
  • Oilton, Texas 
  • Mount Santa Rosa, Guam 
  • Paso Robles, Calif. 
  • Rainbow Ridge, Calif. 
  • Remsen, N.Y. 
  • Riverhead, N.Y. 
  • Rocksprings, Texas 
  • San Clemente Island, Calif. 
  • Slidell, La. 
  • Tamiami, Fla. 
  • Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla. 
  • Vandenberg Space Force Base, Calif. 
  • Watford City, N.D. 
  • Whitehouse, Fla. 
  • Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba 

An Aging Platform

The Air Force purchased most of the existing 44 radars in the 1990s, upgrading the previous 1, 2, and 3 models that have monitored the skies since the late 1950s.

The Raytheon-built ARSR-1 entered service in 1958 and was first used to manage the exploding growth of civil aviation. It had a 170-200 nautical mile range. That early system used the Army/Navy/Fixed Radar Surveillance-20 and later variants of the AN/FPS-66. In the 1960s, Raytheon produced the ARSR-2, which improved maintenance and reliability factors. That radar was the AN/FPS-115.

Both the ARSR-1 and -2 ran on vacuum tubes.

Joint radar evaluation and optimization team members, 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron radar team and Federal Aviation Administration member, testing the Air Route Surveillance Radar system version 4, or ARSR-4. (Air Force photographer Deb Henley)

Westinghouse Electric Corporation built the AN/FPS-130, the radar base of the ARSR-3, fielding it in the 1970s and extending detection ranges beyond 240 nautical miles; it was incorporated into joint military-civil air defense networks.

The ARSR-4, also built by Westinghouse and commissioned in the 1990s, was the first radar in the family to offer three-dimensional target tracking. That capability allows users to simultaneously measure a target’s range, azimuth, and altitude. The system also provided advanced look-down/clutter rejection capabilities for military operations.

Northrop Grumman acquired Westinghouse in 1996, rolling the company’s radar and electronic warfare programs into its Electronic Systems sector.

While the ARSR-4s monitor the perimeter of the country, Guam, and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for the U.S. interior, the FAA manages a network of Common Air Route Surveillance Radars. The CARSR has an estimated 200 nautical mile range.

The complete CARSR system replacement rollout concluded in 2015. The rollout maintained the legacy sites, towers, and mechanical controls while refitting the internal electronics of the radars.

One ARSR-4 location has a strategically vital area to protect: Watford City, N.D., is 165 miles from Minot Air Force Base, N.D., home of the 91st Missile Wing, and 263 miles from Malmstrom Air Force Base, Mont.—putting hundreds of ICBM silos in its range.

The Western Air Defense Sector’s 225th Support Squadron conducts a joint technical inspection of the radar and radios at Ajo Defense Program Facility near the U.S./Mexico border in Ajo, Ariz. (Air National Guard photo by Bruce Robie)

A Larger Network

The ARSR-4 system is one piece of a larger detection system used to track incoming threats.

The Air Force and NORAD used the AN/FPS-117 and AN/Transportable Phased Array System-77, both of which serve as northern warning systems out to 250 nautical miles. These systems are specifically designed for extreme cold weather, such as in their locations in Alaska and northern Canada.

The Space Force operates the AN/Frequency Precision and Quantization-16 Perimeter Acquisition Radar Attack Characterization System, which tracks missiles and precision space objects out to about 2,000 miles. USSF also operates the AN/FPS-108 COBRA DANE to track missiles out to 2,000 miles and high-altitude space objects at 25,000 miles.

The Space Force’s 20th Space Surveillance Squadron at Elgin Air Force Base, Fla., operates the AN/FPS-85 Phased Array Radar, which can track objects beyond 22,000 miles.

NORAD is also currently building and deploying high-frequency systems to detect hypersonic missiles with over-the-horizon radar, modernizing the Northern Warning System and building a polar over-the-horizon radar network.

The Homeland Defense OTHR, which kicked off in 2022, is being funded by both the United States and Canada at an estimated $6-7 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively. Initial Operating Capability is slated for 2028-29, with Full Operational Capability targeted for 2031.

Canada’s Polar OTHR is expected to cost up to $3.5 billion and is a slice of the nation’s estimated $38.6 billion overhaul of its portion of NORAD.

The polar project is currently in the site procurement phase, with operational deployment planned for 2029 and FOC by 2033.

The U.S. Northern Warning System Modernization project “Crossbow” could cost up to $6 billion, and the system rollout is expected to last until 2028, with the project concluding in 2035.

The High-Altitude and Mobile Near-Space Surveillance Systems has a $4.2 billion contract ceiling and is currently in field testing and initial low-altitude deployments. It is expected to achieve full cloud-based command-and-control network integration by 2028.

AFRL Partners with Virgin Galactic to Gather Data on Space Weather

AFRL Partners with Virgin Galactic to Gather Data on Space Weather

Space tourism company Virgin Galactic announced a new partnership with the Air Force Research Laboratory’s space warfare directorate to collect and share space weather data from the company’s suborbital spacecraft, due for its first commercial flight next year.

The two-year cooperative research and development agreement, which Virgin announced Oct. 14, will provide AFRL with key information about space weather to help researchers understand its impact on satellites and infrastructure that reside on orbit—all gleaned from planned flights of the company’s SpaceShip vehicle. Virgin noted that as part of the agreement, AFRL will “evaluate the integration of sensor systems with Virgin Galactic’s next-generation SpaceShip to collect space weather data during flight.”

“This cooperative research and development agreement will help expand and identify new and additional opportunities for our growing fleet,” the company said.

Understanding space environmental and weather conditions—like solar flares and winds, coronal mass ejections, and geomagnetic storms—is important for government organizations and commercial firms alike. SpaceShip’s suborbital flights offer a chance for AFRL to get more insight into a region where those conditions are perhaps less understood: the mesosphere and lower thermosphere, or MLT. Situated between 60 and 110 kilometers above the Earth, the MLT is too low for satellites to operate, but space weather there can disrupt GPS signals and communications.

Shaun Ard, a senior research chemist at AFRL, said high-quality data about MLT space weather dynamics is limited, and the collaboration with Virgin will help the lab’s researchers “protect and advance space-based systems essential to modern infrastructure and exploration.”

Like previous Virgin Galactic vehicles, SpaceShip is designed to be launched from an aircraft “mothership.” After it reaches altitude and is released from its launch platform, SpaceShip will ignite its own rocket motor to reach suborbital space. The company will launch and land the vehicles from Spaceport America in New Mexico. SpaceShip can carry six passengers.

SpaceShip has been moving through integrated ground testing in recent months, and company officials expect to start flight testing in New Mexico this month.

Virgin envisions SpaceShip as both a space tourism vehicle and a research platform and has aggressive plans to ramp up its cadence following its first commercial flight in February 2027. Once its second vehicle enters service next year, it expects to hit a rate of at least 10 flights per month by the summer, company officials said during an earnings call in August.

“This flight rate is an unprecedented achievement in human spaceflight, and this is made possible with our highly reusable spaceship design,” Chief Financial Officer Douglas Ahrens said at the time. “It’s a beautiful machine with vast potential and now we are approaching the moment when we bring it all together with the ramp of commercial spaceflight operations.”

Meink: Operational Prototypes for MMA Drones Coming in 2028

Meink: Operational Prototypes for MMA Drones Coming in 2028

The Air Force will field operational prototypes for an autonomous drone to replace its MQ-9 Reaper in 2028, Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink said Oct. 14.

“We’re going to be fielding operational prototypes by ’28, and we’re just awarding the contract now,” Meink said during a panel discussion with Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, other service secretaries, and senior Pentagon officials at the annual AUSA conference in Washington. “That’s the speed of what we’re fielding capability, and into production—large-scale production—starting in ’29. That is the goal.”

An Air Force spokesperson confirmed to Air & Space Forces Magazine that Meink was referring to the Massed Modular Aircraft, the planned successor to the Reaper.

“The autonomous fighters are already in production,” Meink said, in reference to the Air Force’s Collaborative Combat Aircraft program. General Atomics’ FQ-42A Vengeance and Anduril Industries’ FQ-44A Fury have been selected for production and are undergoing testing with the Air Force’s Experimental Operations Unit at Creech Air Force Base, Nev.

“Now we’re looking at essentially the autonomous strike platform, the autonomous bomber,” Meink said, referring to MMA. The aircraft is envisioned as a multimission aircraft, like the MQ-9, that can conduct strike missions as well as intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. In contrast, CCAs are currently focused on an air-to-air role paired with crewed fighters.

Meink previously announced at AFA’s Air, Space & Cyber conference that the Air Force would field 100 MMAs by 2029 and 500 by 2032.

Air & Space Forces Magazine reported Sept. 30 that the Air Force and Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Unit had narrowed the field for MMA down to seven companies. An Air Force spokesperson declined to confirm any selections, but Meink said Oct. 14 that “we just awarded those contracts … in collaboration with DIU.” He did not name the specific companies or say how many finalists there are.

Sources have told Air & Space Force Magazine the seven companies still in contention are Anduril, Chaos Industries, General Atomics, Grid Aero, Otto Aerospace, Shield AI, and Swarm Aero. They will develop their MMA candidates and submit a proposal to build a prototype.

The Air Force and DIU want each MMA drone to cost $10 million for the base aircraft, not counting the sensors, weapons, or other equipment it may carry. That’s half the $20 million target price the Air Force envisions for CCAs. MMAs will also use open architecture so they could be more easily upgraded with new sensor packages or weapons capabilities.

But while MMAs will have some autonomous capabilities, they won’t be built with all the latest cutting-edge technology in a bid to keep their price down below that of CCAs. They will likely be powered by turboprop engines, for example.

MMA drones are intended to be able to fly about 4,000 miles, twice the range of CCAs, and carry a heavier payload than CCAs. But they will be slower than CCAs.

The MMA effort is part of the broader push by the Pentagon and the Air Force to field more autonomous systems at a lower cost than crewed platforms, or even the drones that are in service today. The goal is to build “combat mass” to counter China’s growing military, which Meink said is going through “the largest weapons buildup probably in the history of the world,” and to respond to the proliferation of autonomous systems in conflicts of today, and the Pentagon’s view, tomorrow.

“There’s no question that there’s a shift coming,” Meink said. “It’s adaptability, scalability, and affordability. The only way we’re going to meet the threat is with autonomous systems.”

Meink said the Pentagon will work with Congress to secure the funding needed for MMA. The Trump administration’s $1.5 trillion fiscal 2027 budget request for the Department of Defense is currently stalled on Capitol Hill. With midterm elections approaching next month, Democrats could take control of one or both chambers, which could lead to congressional gridlock, particularly surrounding the Pentagon’s request for a massive budget increase—and plans to continue that—amid the war with Iran. The DOD plans to devote tens of billions to autonomous warfare just this fiscal year.

Meink acknowledged the uncertainty surrounding the Pentagon’s budget, but expressed confidence the Air Force would be able to hit its targets for MMA.

“It is heavily dependent upon the resources we get from the Hill, but I think we are not only going to deliver significant combat capability, but we’re going to deliver quickly and efficiently,” Meink said.

“We’ve got to make sure this stuff is affordable,” Meink added, referring to efforts across the Air Force and Space Force. “We’ve got to make sure we’re buying it efficiently. And depending on how you do the comparisons, we’re talking five to 10 times cheaper to field some combat power with these autonomous systems compared to not. So it’s critically important. The good news is, in my mind, there’s no question that the leadership we have in the Air Force, in the Space Force, both military and civilian, is ready to do that. And you see that with the results already. We are integrating autonomous fighters into experimental ops units out at Creech right now, from a year from when they first flew to when we were integrating them into experimental ops units. That’s unheard of. And it only took two years to build the first one.”

The goal for MMA is similarly ambitious.

“It’s in the scalability and the producibility,” Meink said. “In many ways, cost goes with schedule. If something is super expensive, there’s a reason for it, which means it’s probably going to take a long time to build, so we’re really focusing on rapid production and scalability, which means we have to get the cost down on these systems as well.”

Meink’s comments came during a panel focused on the Pentagon’s Project Agincourt, a drive to accelerate the fielding of autonomous systems and create a new four-star Autonomous Warfare Command, or AUTOWARCOM, which Hegseth announced during a speech late last month.

“The folks who acquire it need to be right there up with the warfighter at the same time who understand how to iterate it and change on and innovate on it,” Hegseth said.

Adversaries such as Russia and Iran have fielded one-way drone attacks to wreak havoc in Ukraine and across the Middle East. Ukraine has used autonomous systems to great effect to defend against Russia’s invasion. Kyiv’s ongoing and thus far successful Operation Vivaldi offensive has relied heavily on the innovative use of drones, including dropping uncrewed ground vehicles behind enemy lines.

“That’s a different battlefield,” Hegseth said. “We’ve learned a lot from Ukraine, but you can’t use everything that’s in Ukraine because of all the Chinese components involved in it. So you’ve got to be able to ensure that we take the best of that and the lessons learned … and then push it through [with] an AUTOWARCOM commander with four stars who has the ability to drive that change. So we’ve done a lot with acquisitions and a lot with industry from day one to modernize, realizing this is the future of warfare.”

50 DAF Battle Network Programs Rolled into Single, $4.5B ‘Megatron’ Contract Vehicle

50 DAF Battle Network Programs Rolled into Single, $4.5B ‘Megatron’ Contract Vehicle

The Department of the Air Force is consolidating more than 50 programs supporting its efforts to create a vast battle network into a single $4.5 billion contract vehicle to streamline software and technology integration.

The contract, dubbed “Megatron” in reference to the lead villain in the Transformers toy and movie franchise, is a multiple award, indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity vehicle to get technology now and in the future into the DAF Battle Network.

Brig. Gen. Joshua Williams, the department’s new portfolio acquisition executive for command, control, communications, and battle management, highlighted the Megatron program at AFA’s Air, Space, & Cyber conference in September.

“The DAF Battle Network depends on an industrial base that can innovate, integrate, and deliver at the speed of relevance, and we need to build business mechanisms to enable their ability to do that,” Williams told reporters at the conference.

The contract vehicle will cover software delivery, commercial solutions to Battle Network challenges, and other tech needs, Williams said.

The draft notice for Megatron was posted in August, with a final request for proposals expected to be released this quarter. Multiple contract awards are planned for fiscal 2027 under the new “master plan,” Megatron Contracting Officer Julianne Payne told Air & Space Forces Magazine, “which span from sensor integration and connectivity to applications and secure data processing.”

“Key efforts include maturing our digital architecture, fielding secure processing at the edge, and delivering applications that put the operator at the center,” Payne added.

Brig. Gen. Joshua Williams, Department of the Air Force Portfolio Acquisition Executive for Command, Control, Communications and Battle Management, moderates a panel about Next Generation Battle Management on Sept. 15, 2026, at the Air and Space Forces Association’s Air, Space & Cyber conference. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Malia Heemsoth

Merging Efforts

Past contract vehicles often created multiyear contracts tied to fixed requirements and hardware delivery. That doesn’t work in a world of rapid software updates, new sensors, and modes of communication needed for the DAF Battle Network.

“When a specific mission need arises, we can quickly compete delivery or task orders within this pool, compressing our acquisition timeline from over a year to a matter of months to get critical capabilities to the field faster,” Payne said. “For years, our sensors, command and control nodes, and warfighters have operated in stovepipes, making it difficult to share information quickly.”

The C3BM office’s decision to take this new contract approach isn’t happening in a vacuum. Payne noted that adversaries such as China are already building highly sophisticated capabilities to disrupt U.S. military networks. The larger effort to connect all operational capabilities via the battle network and ultimately to the larger Combined Joint All Domain Command and Control network must happen faster.

Soliciting, buying, and implementing standalone platforms for a single aircraft or satellite, common practice for decades, won’t cut it.

“If our systems do not integrate, they do not fight. That realization is what led to the creation of C3BM in 2022 to bring all those fragmented authorities under one roof,” Payne said. “Ultimately, that’s what drove us to the DAF Battle Network concept, and Megatron is the vehicle that is going to deliver it.”

Megatron combines two current IDIQ contracts: the Advanced Battle Management System IDIQ and the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center’s architecture and integration directorate’s XA IDIQ.

The ABMS contract launched in 2020 and was planned for an initial five-year run, allowing the Air Force to award multiple contracts for ABMS work across the force. The Air Force used the ABMS IDIQ to conduct live operational demos for real-time hardware and software testing in field conditions. Contractors participating ranged from small software companies to large defense primes.

The XA IDIQ was a planned 10-year effort from 2022-2032 to bring together early-stage concepts for the network’s architecture and integration.

But even with two large IDIQs, the Air Force had a problem. A company might bring a great concept to AFLCMC via the XA IDIQ but not have a contract under the ABMS IDIQ, creating a bottleneck between capability growth and deployment.

A New Approach

PAE C3BM intends to use the new Megatron contract to find the “best-of-breed” option across six lines of effort for the Battle Network:

  • Digital Architecture & Standards
  • Sensor Integration
  • Secure Data Processing (including Cloud, AI, and Machine Learning)
  • Network Connectivity (Line-of-Sight, Beyond-Line-of-Sight, and anti-jamming)
  • Software Applications
  • Synthetic Environments (computer-simulated training and development)
Col. Freddie Robinson, the Joint Air Component Coordination Element team director for the 186th Air Operations Group, facilitates communication with the Combined Joint Task Force and 1st Lt. Kaitlin Volk, an air battle manager, during Project Convergence Capstone 5 at the National Training Center, Fort Irwin, California. (Air Force Photo by Morgan Brown)

Staying Relevant

With rapid upgrades across the tech industry, the Megatron contract, and larger C3BM efforts, the goal is to bring the best tech into the system while keeping it secure and standardized across the network.

The PAE’s secure processing strategy works across multiple security classification levels, Payne said.

“This capability applies to form factors ranging from enterprise data centers to tactical edge hardware,” Payne said. “The contract mandates that vendors deliver compatible, mission-tailorable solutions, utilizing bare metal, virtualization, or cloud-based services.”

Across the Department of Defense, information technology managers and decision-makers face the burden of maintaining legacy technology and software while merging old but sometimes linchpin systems with new software and hardware.

With Megatron, officials seek to prevent “technical debt,” or the continued use of legacy systems that can’t be upgraded, and avoid future “vendor lock,” which allows a single vendor to control vital software or hardware because of proprietary constraints.

“If a contractor’s solution becomes obsolete or creates technical debt, we can recompete future delivery orders or task orders among the other qualified vendors in our pool. This continuous competition at the order level incentivizes contractors to deliver open, modern, and cost-effective solutions,” Payne said.