AFSOC’s Skyraider Demos New Sensors, Gains Favor in Congress

AFSOC’s Skyraider Demos New Sensors, Gains Favor in Congress

As L3Harris proves its OA-1K Skyraider II special operations aircraft can carry a signals intelligence sensor and electronic attack weapon, a key congressional committee is poised to boost production of the converted Air Tractor prop plane. 

Along with the congressional endorsement, the demonstrations, described by a company executive to Air & Space Forces Magazine, signal positive momentum for the Skyraider program. 

U.S. Special Operations Command selected the heavily modified cropduster for its Armed Overwatch program in 2022, but the plan to field 75 of the aircraft has faced headwinds ever since, with the total trimmed to just 53 due to budget constraints and increased interest in unmanned aircraft. 

Officials at Air Force Special Operations Command, which will operate the plane, still say they want 75 airframes, however, and L3Harris executive Sean Ling expressed confidence in that plan.  

“[It’s a] hot production line, we are executing on the program right now, delivering aircraft, and our anticipation is that that they will need and they will order the full quantity of aircraft,” said Ling, vice president and general manager for modernization and modifications for L3Harris. 

The House Armed Services Committee’s version of the 2027 National Defense Authorization bill released last week recommends a four-fold increase in Skyraider funding, from $59.9 million to $279.9 million. The bill, which sets policy but does not appropriate funds, is typically indicative of congressional priorities. It’s unclear how many aircraft the Pentagon could acquire with nearly $280 million. 

Envisioned as a scout aircraft for counterinsurgency operations in uncontested airspace, the OA-1K is not designed for high-end conflict. But Air Force officials say they are exploring how to expand its mission set. Last month, AFSOC Commander Lt. Gen. Michael Conley hinted that intelligence is one potential use. “It could do exquisite [signals intelligence], collect intel, and also be armed with up to 6,000 pounds of payload,” he told lawmakers, “whether that’s Hellfires, rockets, maybe some small cruise missiles that we’re working on.” 

Ling confirmed signals intelligence is one capability L3Harris is working on. “We’ve already demonstrated for them the capability to integrate additional signals intelligence capabilities,” he said. “It was the pod that’s actually on that aircraft that we essentially modified to incorporate signal capability.” 

Ling said L3 has also made progress pairing its “pack” of air-launched vehicles with the Skyraider, including Red Wolf, a low-cost cruise missile, and Green Wolf, an electronic attack weapon. 

“We’ve demonstrated that those can be installed and applied on this airframe,” Ling said. 

The firm had announced the Red Wolf integration in February but had not previously disclosed that Green Wolf had been integrated.

Ling said neither weapon has yet flown on Skyraider, but added “that would not be a difficult challenge.” 

L3Harris has more in mind than outfitting the OA-1K for AFSOC: it’s also on the hunt for international customers. While Ling declined to specify potentially interested countries, he said the company is “very aggressively involved in discussions with more than three potential customers.” 

Foreign customers could help keep the OA-1K production line humming in Waco, Texas, and a larger U.S. investment would encourage international customers to sign on. 

“We scaled from, frankly, zero at Waco to standing that production line up,” Ling said. “It is running. It is efficient. But there is further scaling that can be done to increase orders and throughput.” 

Space Force Picks Intelsat, Viasat for Protected SATCOM Program

Space Force Picks Intelsat, Viasat for Protected SATCOM Program

The Space Force announced contract awards to Intelsat General and Viasat to begin building a constellation of satellites in geosynchronous orbit for protected, secure communications.

The contracts, which total $437 million, are part of the Protected Tactical SATCOM-Global program. The companies will build the first two operational PTS-G satellites, known as “Swarm 1,” which the service expects to launch in 2028. The program aims to bridge the gap between the military’s more focused tactical SATCOM needs and the less secure communications provided by commercial constellations.

PTS-G falls under the broader Protected Tactical SATCOM Family of Systems, which will ultimately replace the current Advanced Extremely High Frequency satellite constellation. The architecture includes satellites, the encrypted PTS-W waveform, ground control systems, and a joint Army-Air Force anti-jam modem project. In fiscal 2027, the Space Force is requesting about $450 million across those efforts and plans to spend $2 billion through fiscal ‘31.

“PTS-G is a key component of the [the Space Force’s] resilient SATCOM architecture, designed to provide tactical warfighters with a worldwide, transponded system, leveraging both Protected Tactical Waveform (PTW) and non-PTW waveforms, to provide critical communication to existing legacy wideband users while also deploying PTW to provide anti-jam satellite communications to counter emerging threats and ensure connectivity in denied environments,” the Space Force said in a statement.

About $150 million in fiscal ‘27 is dedicated for PTS-G, which will field satellites that can operate in Ka and X-band frequencies. Last July, the Space Force awarded initial PTS-G prototype contracts to Viasat, Intelsat and three other firms—Boeing, Northrop Grumman, and Astranis.

Budget documents indicate the service plans to buy four satellites as part of Swarm 1. It’s not immediately clear whether it will award contracts to more vendors or buy the remaining two satellites from Viasat and Intelsat. The Space Force also plans to select providers for the program’s “joint hubs,” which will be part of the broader Protected Tactical SATCOM ground infrastructure.

While PTS-G will initially provide regional coverage, the Space Force’s vision is for worldwide coverage.

“The approach for Swarm 1 exemplifies acquisition transformation by leveraging a competitive strategy with commercial partners to accelerate delivery of capabilities while driving down long-term costs,” the Space Force said. “It underscores Space Systems Command’s overarching mission to deliver space capabilities that ensure U.S. space superiority and deter aggression in the space domain.”

The PTS-G contracts follow a $398 million award to Northrop Grumman on May 15 for the Space Force’s Enhanced Protected Tactical SATCOM-Prototype program, another element of the PTS Family of Systems. That spacecraft will feature advanced anti-jam and data processing capabilities and is expected to launch in 2030. The Space Force plans to spend $166 million on Enhanced PTS-P in fiscal 2027, which will support a critical design review for Northrop’s prototype and the start of satellite manufacturing and testing.

US Launches Strikes on Iran in Retaliation for Downed Apache Helicopter

US Launches Strikes on Iran in Retaliation for Downed Apache Helicopter

The U.S. military launched “self-defense” airstrikes against Iran on June 9 in response to the downing of a U.S. Army AH-64 Apache attack helicopter, which President Donald Trump said was shot down by Iran.

The airstrikes by Air Force and Navy aircraft began at 5 p.m. Eastern Time, which is after midnight in Iran, according to U.S. Central Command. Just under four hours later, the U.S. military said it had concluded its actions against Iran for now.

“CENTCOM forces struck Iranian air defense, ground control stations, and surveillance radar sites near the Strait of Hormuz with precision munitions from U.S. Air Force and Navy fighter jets,” the command said in a statement. “The operation was a proportional response to recent attacks on U.S. forces and international commercial ships transiting regional waters.

“U.S. forces remain vigilant and postured to defend against unjustified Iranian aggression,” CENTCOM added.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said in a statement that its forces would carry out “intensive and direct” strikes on American forces in response.

The Apache was downed near the Strait of Hormuz the previous night in a dramatic incident in which the two pilots were rescued by an unmanned boat operated by the U.S. Navy. Air Force and Navy aircraft, including MQ-9 Reapers and fighters, provided protection from the skies overhead. 

“I have just been informed by our Great Military that last night the Iranians shot down one of our highly sophisticated Apache Helicopters while patrolling over the Strait of Hormuz,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “There were two pilots involved, both are safe and uninjured. Nevertheless, the United States must, of necessity, respond to this attack.”

CENTCOM said it launched the strikes later in the day at Trump’s direction.

A U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon aircraft refuels from a U.S. KC-135 Stratotanker in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility, May 25, 2026. U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Adriana Jordan-Alcaniz

Iran did not claim to have downed the helicopter and suggested that the Apache could have crashed because of an accident. 

“Foreign forces in proximity to our territory are at constant risk on account of their own human errors, plain accidents, or potentially being caught in crossfire,” Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said on social media.

Al Arabiya, a news outlet based in Saudi Arabia, reported that Iran had informed international mediators that it had not taken action to down the helicopter.  

CENTCOM said the Apache crash was under investigation. An Iranian drone is believed to have hit the Apache, U.S. officials said. One possibility, analysts and some officials say, is that the downing might have been unintentional and the result of a midair collision.

Adm. Brad Cooper, who heads CENTCOM, declined to discuss the episode after briefing lawmakers in a closed-door meeting. 

“We’re just going to have to see,” he told reporters on Capitol Hill.

The Apache went down in the water as darkness fell. The pilots were rescued within approximately two hours by a Saronic Corsair, a 24-foot uncrewed small boat operated by CENTCOM’s Task Force 59, which uses drones to patrol the waters of the Middle East, in the early hours of June 9 local time.

The rescue of aircrew by an uncrewed surface vessel was described as a first-of-its kind operation by the U.S. military. 

The Apache is the first American crewed aircraft that has been lost to Iran since an Air Force F-15E Strike Eagle was shot down by Iran on April 3. The two aviators from that plane were eventually rescued from inside Iran—the pilot within a few hours by search and rescue crews, and the weapons systems officer roughly days later after a dramatic Special Operations raid deep inside Iranian territory.

An A-10 Thunderbolt II was hit by Iranian fire while providing support to the rescue mission shortly after the incident, and its pilot flew towards friendly airspace before ejecting safely. 

A KC-135 crashed in Iraq on March 12, killing all six crew members after colliding with another tanker. On March 2, a Kuwaiti F/A-18 shot down three U.S. F-15Es in a friendly fire incident. Around 30 unmanned MQ-9s have also been lost during the conflict.

The U.S. has used Apaches to destroy Iranian small boats in the Strait of Hormuz and patrol waters in the area to enforce a U.S. blockade of Iranian ports, which has been in place since mid-April. The U.S. military published imagery of Cooper riding in an Apache over the water last month.

Iran has fired at U.S. manned aircraft and drones operating over the waters surrounding Iran and has claimed to have downed multiple drones.

The U.S. military has acknowledged some incidents of Iranian fire around the waters near the Strait of Hormuz, including at American aircraft, as well as U.S. Navy vessels and commercial ships during the ceasefire, and has responded by attacking Iranian air defenses, drone stations, coastal radars, and other military facilities during the ceasefire that has been in place since early April.

CNN reported that Apache was a hit with a Shahed-type drone. Shaheds are one-way attack drones that function as slow-moving cruise missiles, approaching their target using preprogrammed coordinates. If the drone were a Shahed, that could support the theory that Iran did not intentionally shoot down the Apache.

Though Trump directed a military response, he expressed less concern about the episode in some media comments, telling The Wall Street Journal that the downing “wasn’t a big deal.” 

Wilsbach: KC-135s Damaged in Epic Fury Will Return to Service, Some Will Take ‘Year or Two’

Wilsbach: KC-135s Damaged in Epic Fury Will Return to Service, Some Will Take ‘Year or Two’

Air Force leaders expect all six KC-135 Stratotankers that were damaged but not destroyed as part of Operation Epic Fury will eventually be repaired and returned to service.

Some of those damaged KC-135s are already flying again, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Kenneth S. Wilsbach told the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on defense June 9. But the most heavily damaged refuelers could take a year or two to be fully repaired, he added.

Wilsbach did not say provide specific numbers on how many have returned to service or not. But he said “most” had been able to muster at least one flight, even if only to fly to another site to be repaired.

“Some of them are already flying,” Wilsbach said. “In fact, most of them are already flying. Some of them had a one-time flight to have further repair, but some of them are already back in service. The ones that have the more significant damage will take a year or two to get fixed.”

Five of the KC-135s were damaged in an Iranian missile strike on Prince Sultan Air Base in early March, which was first reported by the Wall Street Journal. President Donald Trump, in a March 14 post on Truth Social, confirmed the strike but downplayed the extent of the damage, saying four of the five tankers had “virtually no damage” and were already back in service.

In the weeks that followed, photographs emerged of two battle-damaged KC-135s transiting through RAF Mildenhall in the U.K., each showing signs that they had been hit with shrapnel or other projectiles and temporarily patched up to fly for repairs.

A sixth KC-135 sustained significant damage to its vertical stabilizer in a midair collision with another Stratotanker. That damaged KC-135 was able to land safely in the March 12 incident, but the other was completely destroyed when it crashed in Iraq, killing all six Airmen aboard.

Three weeks after that crash, the Air Force pulled a KC-135 out of its aircraft storage facility known as the Boneyard to be put back into flying status, though the Air Force has not confirmed it was done specifically in response to the crash.

The U.S. military has lost at least 40 aircraft as part of operations against Iran. The bulk of those are roughly 30 MQ-9 Reapers, but other losses include four F-15E Strike Eagles, two MC-130 special operations refueling and mobility aircraft, the crashed KC-135, an E-3 AWACS, an A-10, about three MH-6 Little Bird helicopters, and most recently an Army Apache helicopter. Additional aircraft have also been damaged.

In another hearing April 30, Wilsbach told lawmakers the Air Force wants to replace at least some of the aircraft lost as part of Epic Fury as part of the supplemental budget process.

In the June 9 hearing, Wilsbach told subcommittee members that the damaged and lost KC-135s “had a very short-term” effect on the Air Force’s ability to generate tanker sorties. However, he said, the service surged other tankers into the region to make up for the Stratotanker losses, and there is now “very little impact” operationally to the loss of the KC-135s.

When asked if the 15 KC-46 Pegasus refueling tankers requested in the Air Force’s 2027 budget are enough to make up for both the lost KC-135 and the service’s recapitalization needs, Air Force Secretary Troy Meink said the Air Force is buying them as fast as Boeing can make them.

Meink said the damage that took some KC-135s out of the Iran fight “could potentially” be a factor in deciding which bases would receive new KC-46s, and said it will “be considered as part of the strategic basing process.”

Military-Specific AI Tools Aim to Ease Admin Workload

Military-Specific AI Tools Aim to Ease Admin Workload

GenAI.mil, the Pentagon’s main generative artificial intelligence platform, has more than 1 million users and access to some of the world’s biggest AI models like ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini. But a handful of startups, including one founded by an Air Force veteran, say there’s room for more military-focused AI tools too.

Smack Technologies, cofounded by a former Marine special operator, recently raised $32 million to build AI tools it says are trained on combat-specific data to enable faster decisions on the battlefield. Edgerunner AI, cofounded by an Army vet, has launched an agentic AI assistant that can perform tasks autonomously, also focused on edge compbattlefield decision-making.

AI Cowboys, led by CEO and retired USAF senior master sergeant Michael Pendleton, is a bit different. Its new Military AI Agent Marketplace is focused less on the front lines and more on the complicated bureaucracy of personnel management.

The startup’s “agents”—essentially an autonomous software program that can execute some tasks on its own—can help users translate military performance documents into language that civilians can understand for job applications, write reports, build lesson plans and training schedules, and run administrative tasks for driver certification, among other tasks.

For Airmen and Guardians specifically, Pendleton told Air & Space Forces Magazine, the marketplace can help manage Enlisted Performance Briefs, Officer Performance Briefs, Air Force Form 911 awards, and Department of Air Force Instruction references.

Pendleton retired in 2022 after a 20-year career that concluded with a stint as a human resources and staffing manager in the Air Force. He saw how high-level offices such as those in the Pentagon and combatant commands were using AI tools to aid in their operational and maintenance work, but he didn’t see tools for the rank and file.

AI Cowboys aims to fix that with ways to reduce the friction of daily admin work that nearly all Airmen and Guardians face and provide a secure way to do that work, he said.

“For Air Force and Space Force use, the security model has to be clear: unclassified personal productivity can happen in the commercial environment, while command-level or sensitive workflows require authorized, controlled, and potentially air-gapped deployment,” he said.

Pendleton was quick to note such tools are not currently part of a DOD or Department of Air Force program; users must pay a $29 monthly fee for access to the content.

But like other startups, AI Cowboys believes its military AI marketplace can be more useful than general purpose AI models for tasks. The key is that their AI is trained on and works from existing DOD and service-specific doctrine manuals.

“The goal is not to throw military data into a generic chatbot,” Pendleton said. “The goal is to give Airmen and Guardians doctrine-grounded support inside security boundaries that make sense for the mission.”

Data for their models is locally maintained on the individual computing device, keeping the users’ data onboard, rather than being handled by a third party, such as OpenAI.

The marketplace has nine categories with 450 AI agents to assist with administrative tasks that service members face.

Embracing AI

The popularity of GenAI.mil and the rise of startups like AI Cowboys means more and more Airmen and Guardians are likely to be using AI in some form or fashion. The Air Force and Space Force are embracing the new tech while also trying to keep a handle on it.

In early May, Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force David R. Wolfe said that the service plans to train every Airman on AI and it had created AI Action Teams to assist leaders in using the new technology. Part of that is a push to use AI in screenings for promotion boards, Wolfe said in a Military Officers Association of America webinar.

The chief emphasized that AI could help with automating processes for the promotion screening teams, not actually approve the candidates.

The service also announced in late April that it would recruit, train, and retain AI professionals throughout the force and make its hiring and accessions efforts more efficient to do so. That was shortly after it had released its service-wide AI Strategy.

In May 2025, the Air Force announced it was establishing center for artificial intelligence development as part of preexisting programs with Microsoft, Stanford University, and MIT.

From 200-Plus to 31: How the Pentagon Cut Religion Codes

From 200-Plus to 31: How the Pentagon Cut Religion Codes

The Pentagon fulfilled Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s promise to slash the number of Religious Affiliation Codes used by the military to track the volume of members adhering to different religions and to shape the chaplain corps to support them. The change reduces the number of religions counted for such purposes from more than 200 to just 31.

Changes include collapsing the number of identified Christian denominations to 21 and removing Pagan, Wicca, and other nontraditional faiths from the list. Individual service members, however, “will not be limited” by the list for the purposes of identifying their religious preference on the dogtags they wear around their necks. The tags can be vital for helping chaplains determine the religious needs of warfighters wounded in battle.

Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell posted the new list June 5, along with a May 20 memo from Undersecretary for Personnel and Readiness Anthony J. Tata. The memo states the new list replaces the previous Faith and Belief Codes and was necessary to “streamline the … collection of religious preferences selection for service members to enhance the delivery of targeted religious support from the Chaplaincy.”

The “long overdue” changes, Parnell wrote, are “designed to allow chaplains to quickly look at the religious composition of their units and determine how they structure resources to best provide for warfighters of all faith groups.”

In addition to 21 Christian denominations, the new list includes Buddhism, Hindu, Islam, and Judaism, among other faiths, but not Paganism, which Hegseth singled out last September because some troops have petitioned for religious exemptions so they could grow beards.

“If you want a beard, you can join Special Forces,” Heseth told hundreds of general officers at Quantico, Va., last Sept. 30. “If not, then shave. We don’t have a military full of Nordic pagans, but unfortunately, we have had leaders who either refuse to call BS and enforce standards, or leaders who felt like they were not allowed to enforce standards.”

Retired Maj. Gen. Randall E. Kitchens, a former Air Force Chief of Chaplains, said the the new list “appears to represent major faith groups,” and that the prior Faith and Belief Codes list had “become difficult to manage.”

“This way forward—while it may not be perfect—helps to represent religious affiliation in broader categories without exclusion and a clear, unified process to add another category if there is a broader need,” he said.

Retired Maj. Gen. Steven Schaick, another former Chief of Chaplains, said previous lists included numerous Christian denominations. “We’ve made the ‘religious preference’ choices exceedingly difficult for a generation that cannot distinguish the term Protestant from Lutheran,” he said. “Many military recruits are overwhelmed by religious choices when filling out entrance forms.”

Instead of multiple varieties of Presbyterian branches, he said, there is now just one. But while broader categories may be eaiser to manage, Schaick said, “I can imagine the endorsers of smaller faith groups feeling a bit marginalized in that their specific numbers will no longer be closely tracked.”

Beyond counting, it is unclear how the new list will impact service members whose religious preferences may now be lumped into the “Other Religions” category. It’s also unclear whether the military has any chaplains whose religions are no longer on the official list and are now covered by “Other Religions.”

Officials said in a social media post June 8 that its previous list “included redundant and unnecessary labeling, and the mistake has been fixed.”

The Pentagon did not provide the old list for comparisons, but a March 2017 memo from the Armed Forces Chaplains Board contained 216 codes, 170 of which were variations of Christanity, 40 covered popular non-Christian religions including Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism and Baha’i, and about a dozen represented nontraditional religions including:

  • Asatru
  • Church Of The Spiral Tree
  • Dian Wi (Dianic Wicca)
  • Druid
  • Gard Wi (Gardnerian Wicca
  • Heathen
  • Pagan
  • Sacred Well Congregation
  • Seax Wi (Seax Wicca)
  • Shaman
  • Troth

In his social media post, Parnell said the Pentagon’s changes to the list makes no “claims on the legitimacy of any faith or religious belief, nor is it intended to provide a list of ‘officially approved’ religions.”

Rather, he said, the Pentagon “places a high value on the First Amendment and the free exercise of religion.”

By reducing the number of religions tracked, the Chaplain Corps can better identify in broad numbers the number and types of chaplains needed to look after the spiritual care and wellbeing of military members. “With this new change, we believe we can provide the best data to support our chaplains in that effort,” he wrote.

2026 codes 30 codes
Code Description
2017 codes 221 codes
Code Description

New 3-Star Nominees: AFCENT Commander, Reserve Chief, and More

New 3-Star Nominees: AFCENT Commander, Reserve Chief, and More

The White House has nominated a half-dozen Air Force general officers for three-star jobs, including new leaders for Air Forces Central in the Middle East, the Air Force Reserve, and one of the service’s top acquisition organizations. 

The nominations also include two potential deputies at Air Force major commands and a new director for the Defense Logistics Agency. 

The Senate received the nominations June 4 and an Air Force spokesperson confirmed the moves to Air & Space Forces Magazine.

The nominees, with their current ranks and their potential future jobs, are:

  • Lt. Gen. David R. Iverson: deputy commander of Pacific Air Forces 
  • Maj. Gen. Daniel T. Lasica: commander of Air Forces Central, 9th Air Force, and Combined Forces Air Component Commander for U.S. Central Command 
  • Maj. Gen. Paul R. Fast: chief of Air Force Reserve and commander of Air Force Reserve Command 
  • Maj. Gen. Larry R. Broadwell Jr.: deputy commander of Air Combat Command 
  • Maj. Gen. David J. Sanford: director of the Defense Logistics Agency 
  • Brig. Gen. Jason D. Voorheis: commander of the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center 

If confirmed, Iverson would serve as deputy to PACAF boss Gen. Kevin B. Schneider. Currently, Iverson is the deputy commander of U.S. Forces Korea and the commander of the 7th Air Force, the service’s main arm on the Korean Peninsula.  

An F-15E fighter pilot by trade, Iverson has commanded a Strike Eagle squadron in Europe and an Air Expeditionary Wing in the Middle East but has been focused on the Indo-Pacific region for the last five years, first as director of operations for Pacific Air Forces and then in his current position. 

Lasica has spent the past five years at U.S. European Command, first as director of plans, policy, strategy, and capabilities and now as director of operations. Trained as an F-16 pilot, Lasica has flown combat missions in the Middle East in support of operations Southern Watch and Enduring Freedom. He has twice commanded fighter wings and also spent time in the Pentagon as the director of current operations on the Air Staff.

If confirmed, Lasica would succeed Lt. Gen. Derek C. France, who has commanded AFCENT since 2024 and overseen a period of intense combat in the Middle East. That has included Operation Rough Rider, the campaign against Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen; Operation Midnight Hammer, the strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities; and Operation Epic Fury, the largest air campaign in a generation.

Fast is currently commander of the 4th Air Force under Air Force Reserve Command. In that role, he oversees the command’s airlift and refueling units. Prior to that, he served as mobilization assistant to a variety of leaders, including the deputy chief of staff for Air Force Futures, deputy commander of PACAF, and commander of the 5th Air Force.  

Assuming he is confirmed, Fast would succeed Lt. Gen. John P. Healy, who has pushed for the Reserve to receive new aircraft to recapitalize its aging fleet. 

Voorheis is the program acquisition executive for command, control, communications, and battle management—a sweeping job charged with overseeing the expansive DAF Battle Network the Air Force is building to connect sensors and shooters around the globe.

Prior to his current job, Voorheis was program executive officer for fighters and advanced aircraft, and in that position, he has helped oversee the development of major programs such as the F-47 fighter and Collaborative Combat Aircraft drones. 

Assuming he is confirmed, Voorheis would join a small club of Air Force generals to skip a rank and go straight from one star to three—another former PEO for fighters and advanced aircraft, Gen. Dale R. White, leaped from brigadier general to lieutenant general when he became military deputy to the Air Force acquisition executive. White is now the four-star director of critical major weapons systems, overseeing the Air Force’s biggest programs.

Voorheis, as head of AFLCMC, would work closely with White as one of the service’s top acquisition officials.

Broadwell is currently deputy commander of the 16th Air Force, also known as Air Forces Cyber. He has commanded at the squadron, group, and wing level and served as both a C-130E navigator and F-15C and F-22 pilot. Before joining Air Forces Cyber, he spent three years on the Joint Staff at the Pentagon as the deputy director of operations and the deputy director for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations. 

If confirmed, Broadwell would be the No. 2 to ACC boss Gen. Adrian L. Spain and bring a unique understanding of cyber warfare to the job 

Sanford currently serves as the director of logistics operations for the Defense Logistics Agency. He has a deep background in logistics and previously served as director of logistics, engineering, and force protection for Air Mobility Command.

He would be the first Air Force director of the DLA since 2017.

Qatar-Gifted ‘Bridge’ Air Force One Painted, Final Modifications Underway

Qatar-Gifted ‘Bridge’ Air Force One Painted, Final Modifications Underway

The Boeing 747-8 gifted to the United States by Qatar to be used as a “bridge” Air Force One has been painted and is now undergoing its final modifications by the government, the Air Force said June 8.

An Air Force spokesperson provided the update on the status of the new presidential transport aircraft, referred to as the VC-25B bridge aircraft but declined to say when it will officially be delivered to the Air Force and operational. The Air Force said in May that the plane was on schedule for a summer 2026 rollout.

A photo of the bridge Air Force One, taken by Texas-based aviation photographer Travis Ghormley, surfaced on social media June 7. 

The aircraft matches previously released mockups of President Donald Trump’s preferred red-white-and-dark blue livery, which the entire Air Force executive airlift fleet is getting. The tail depicts a billowing U.S. flag instead of the more formal, static Stars and Stripes that have decorated other Air Force One planes.

L3Harris, the contractor working on the bridge aircraft at its Texas facilities, declined to comment about the photo or status of the plane to Air & Space Forces Magazine.

The bridge Air Force One is intended to act as an interim presidential aircraft while Boeing continues work on the pair of 747s originally earmarked to be the VC-25Bs. 

Boeing has been working on those planes for about a decade, and they are years behind schedule due to supply chain problems and a lack of cleared workers. They were originally to be delivered in 2024, but are now likely to arrive in 2028. President Trump has repeatedly voiced his dissatisfaction with Boeing’s performance and the delays.

In early 2025, news emerged that the administration planned to accept a 747-8 from Qatar and turn it into an interim Air Force One. Congressional Democrats questioned the ethics and legality of accepting such a large gift from Qatar, especially since reports indicated the plane would be donated to Trump’s presidential library after he leaves office.

The Air Force previously announced May 1 that the aircraft’s flight testing had finished, and that it needed to be painted before delivery.

Critics have also expressed concern over the last year that accepting a plane used by Qatar could present a security risk, such as by allowing listening devices or other bugs to be planted on the aircraft. But the Air Force said in May that a cadre of “elite specialists” from several agencies worked to catch any “technical hazards” on the plane.

New Commander Takes the Reins at Air Force Research Lab

New Commander Takes the Reins at Air Force Research Lab

The Air Force Research Laboratory installed its newest commander, Brig. Gen. Douglas Wickert, in a June 3 ceremony at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. 

Wickert most recently served as director of air, space, and cyber operations at Air Force Materiel Command, and before that, he led the 412th Test Wing at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. An F-16 pilot earlier in his career, he spent several years as an instructor pilot at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., and at Osan Air Base in South Korea. 

Speaking at the change of command ceremony, Wickert emphasized AFRL’s role in helping shape the future of warfighting.

“The best way to predict the future is to invent it. The best way to win the future is to invent it. If we are to preserve the peace of the world in this pivotal decade, our science and technology enterprise must answer that same call again,” Wickert said. “It is our turn to discover, it is our turn to develop, it is our turn to deliver, and together our turn to win the future.”

He takes the helm amid a major AFRL reorganization, designed to position the lab to more quickly transition technology to Air Force and Space Force operators. Outgoing commander Brig. Gen. Jason Bartolomei led that organizational redesign, which consolidated 11 of its organizations into seven and aligned the remaining offices with the Department of the Air Force’s broader acquisition transformation

As part of that effort, the services are reconfiguring siloed program offices into mission-centric portfolio acquisition executives, or PAEs. To more quickly funnel technology to those PAEs, the lab under Bartolomei’s leadership created four “integrating mechanisms” that cut across each of its organizations. Those include:

  • Communities of practice, which will link researchers from different backgrounds with lab partners to share expertise
  • Integrated planning teams, designed to spot technology gaps
  • Innovation pipeline and advanced architecture cells, which create partnerships between AFRL and PAEs to align science and technology with acquisition requirements and timelines
  • Campaigns focused on accelerating the transition of high-impact S&T projects

Bartolomei, who is retiring after 29 years in the Air Force and two years as AFRL commander, said this new structure positions AFRL well for the future. 

“AFRL is the most important organization in the Department of the Air Force because it is the only organization not just thinking about the future, but committed to winning it,” Bartolomei said during the ceremony. “We are entering the next golden age of science and technology, and AFRL is well postured to bring the future faster for our nation.”