Air Force Conducts Test Launch of Minuteman III ICBM

Air Force Conducts Test Launch of Minuteman III ICBM

The Air Force test launched its second unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile of the year from Vandenberg Space Force Base, Calif., May 21.

The missile, carrying a single Mk21 high-fidelity reentry vehicle, took off at 12:01 a.m. Pacific Time to travel more than 4,200 miles at over 15,000 miles per hour, striking a designated target area near Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands.

“This ICBM test launch underscores the strength of the nation’s nuclear deterrent and the readiness of the ICBM leg of the triad,” Gen. Thomas Bussiere, head of Air Force Global Strike Command, said in a statement. The Air Force so far has conducted about 300 routine ICBM test launches, including one earlier this year.

The Ronald Reagan Ballistic Missile Defense Test Site in the Marshall Islands collected the reentry vehicle’s travel data, while advanced sensors tracked the missile’s flight during the terminal phase to assess its performance.

An unarmed Minuteman III Intercontinental Ballistic Missile launches during an operational test at 12:01 a.m. Pacific Time, May 21, 2025, at Vandenberg Space Force Base, Calif. U.S. Space Force photo by Senior Airman Kadielle Shaw

For the test launch, a randomly selected Minuteman III missile was pulled from Malmstrom Air Force Base, Mont. The Air Force stations these missiles across fields in Montana, Colorado, Nebraska, North Dakota, and Wyoming. For “Glory Trip” tests, a partially disassembled missile is pulled from a silo, transported by truck across the country, and reassembled at the California test site. Crews from Malmstrom’s 341st Missile Wing and the 90th Missile Wing at F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyo., supported the maintenance efforts for the May test. The service’s release said that Airmen from all three ICBM wings—the 90th, 91st, and 341st Missile Wings—participated in the test launch.

“This powerful safeguard is maintained by dedicated Airmen—missileers, defenders, helicopter operators and the teams who supports them—who ensure the security of the nation and its allies,” Bussiere added.

The 95th Wing’s 625th Strategic Operations Squadron at Offutt Air Force Base, Neb., additionally plays a key role in ensuring ICBM command and control. The squadron writes and verifies missile targeting instructions and supports the Airborne Launch Control System (ALCS)—a backup system that can send launch commands from the air if ground systems are compromised. Aboard a U.S. Navy E-6B Mercury aircraft, the ALCS preserves nuclear command and control, ready to trigger launches remotely if needed. Last month, the squadron conducted its routine ALCS test as part of its biannual exercises, and the Air Force conducted an airborne ICBM test launch last November.

“Minuteman III remains the bedrock of our nation’s strategic deterrent, and the unwavering dedication of the Airmen who ensure its readiness are a testament to its inherent lethality,” said Col. Dustin Harmon, commander of Vandenberg’s 377th Test and Evaluation Group, the unit that oversees the tests.

The Air Force plans to replace its 55-year-old Minuteman III with the new Sentinel ICBM, though service officials now say the Minuteman missiles could stay in service until 2050, far longer than its original 2030s decommissioning timeline.

In last month’s defense reconciliation bill, lawmakers proposed adding $1.5 billion to the Sentinel program in the 2025 budget resolution, along with roughly half a billion to keep Minuteman operational. The service leaders and experts have advocated for critical upgrades to the system, including modifications to its silos, electronics and warheads to ensure the weapon’s continued viability.

 “As we look to the future, these same Airmen are paving the way for the Sentinel ICBM, ensuring a seamless transition to this next-generation capability and the continued security of our nation,” added Harmon.

Can Spacecraft Sweat? New Tech Could Make Them Reusable

Can Spacecraft Sweat? New Tech Could Make Them Reusable

Building spacecraft that can survive the heat of reentry by “sweating” a thermally protective layer of gas has been a dream of aerospace engineers for 50 years. Now an Air Force Research Laboratory grant aims to make that a reality.

Transpiration cooling, as the sweating process is more formally known, is the key to designing truly reusable spacecraft and hypersonic vehicles, Hassan Saad Ifti, an assistant aerospace engineering professor at Texas A&M University, told Air & Space Forces Magazine.

The school is sharing a $1.7 million grant with Canopy Aerospace, a Colorado-based advanced materials-manufacturing startup, to produce a model vehicle to test transpiration technology for a variety of applications, including atmospheric flight and reentry from orbit. AFRL awarded the grant in August, and the team hopes to have a model for static testing ready by the end of the year, Ifti said.

Transpiration cooling occurs when pressurized fluid spewed from the front of a hypersonic vehicle instantly evaporates, forming a protective layer of gas that insulates against the extreme heat generated by friction between the vehicle and the atmosphere, according to Canopy. It is “one of the only researched technologies that could enable true reusability for mass return from orbit on ballistic trajectories,” the company added in September.

Several Air Force and Space Force missions could benefit from the idea, such as the development of a hypersonic cruise missile or the plan to more widely adopt reusable rockets to bring national security satellites to orbit. The technology may also bring to life a vision of an orbital economy where spacecraft can take off and land like commercial aircraft in the span of a few hours.

Sweating can allow hypersonic systems, or those that travel at five times the speed of sound and can change direction, to move faster and “perform more aggressive maneuvers,” Canopy said. The U.S. is racing alongside Russia and China to build an arsenal of hypersonic weapons that can strike anywhere in the world within hours.

Current state-of-the-art technology isn’t fully reusable because it relies on heat-resistant ceramic tiles like those employed by the U.S. space shuttle program and SpaceX’s Starship, Ifti said.

The tiles can be damaged during reentry, when space vehicles can reach up to 25,000 mph, or 36 times the speed of sound. Inspecting the tiles and replacing those that are damaged may take as long as six months, Ifti said.

Perhaps the most notable example of the tiles’ limitations is the Columbia space shuttle disaster in 2003, when a piece of foam insulation broke off of the shuttle’s propellant tank and hit its left wing. The impact damaged or knocked off some of the tiles that were designed to keep the shuttle from overheating. The shuttle broke apart upon reentering the atmosphere over Texas, killing all seven crew members onboard.

More than two decades later, “the dream is full reusability” of space vehicles, Ifti said. Advances in materials and 3D printing could finally make that dream a reality “within a few decades,” added Ifti, who has worked on transpiration cooling in the U.S. and United Kingdom.

The technology could also assist commercial hypersonic jets, like a “next-generation Concorde” that could fly from New York to Tokyo in less than two hours, Ifti said. Venus Aerospace, a Houston-based startup working on hypersonic flight, announced May 14 it had successfully tested an engine that could allow aircraft launched from conventional runways to reach Mach 5 or 6, compared to commercial airliners that average cruising airspeeds slower than sound.

“At those speeds, you have to think about the heating problem on the nose and the leading edges of the wings, and that’s where you could use transpiration cooling,” Ifti said.

The Physics of ‘Sweating

Ifti likened transpiration cooling technology to the way a puffer jacket creates a barrier of air that traps heat in and keeps cold out. Similarly, a layer of gas around a returning spacecraft stops temperatures as high as 10,000 degrees Celsius from reaching the vehicle.

Canopy Aerospace’s 3D-printed materials are already being tested in Texas A&M’s state of the art wind tunnels. The university has several wind tunnels for testing hypersonic flight materials, Ifti said. He argues advances in testing is the third factor, alongside new materials and 3D printing, that can make transpiration cooling a reality.

Those diagnostic tools have come a long way in recent years, he added. For instance, the cameras used to record the experiments in the A&M wind tunnels captured up to 7 million frames per second. “We can see things that our colleagues a decade ago could not,” Ifti said.

The data collected helps Ifti and his colleagues understand how gases behave at high speeds and temperatures, particularly as air grows more turbulent for a vehicle approaching Earth.

Following wind tunnel testing of Canopy’s material, the joint team aims to build a mock vehicle no longer than 1 meter by the end of the year, Ifti said.

The model will have reservoirs of thermally protective gas spread throughout the spacecraft that “sweats” out through porous material, Ifti said.

By the time the project concludes next year, the lessons learned could inform how engineers build a model for flight testing.

“The dream is a flight test,” Ifti said. “But that’s not cheap.”

Pentagon Allows Trump to Use Qatari Jet as Air Force One

Pentagon Allows Trump to Use Qatari Jet as Air Force One

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has accepted a Boeing 747-8 jet from Qatar that President Donald Trump plans to use as Air Force One, the Pentagon said May 21.

“The Department of Defense will work to ensure proper security measures and functional-mission requirements are considered for an aircraft used to transport the President of the United States,” Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement.

Parnell referred further questions to the Air Force. A spokesperson told Air & Space Forces Magazine the service will award a contract to convert the former Qatari royal plane, offered as a gift to Trump earlier this month, to serve the needs of the U.S. commander in chief.

It is unclear what the aircraft needs to transform into a flying White House and how the Qatari jet may differ from the current VC-25A presidential airlift fleet, called Air Force One when the chief executive is aboard, or its planned replacement, known as the VC-25B in military parlance. The Air Force declined to provide further details about the plans for the aircraft, citing classification and security concerns.

Before the transfer was announced, Air Force Secretary Troy E. Meink and Chief of Staff Gen. David W. Allvin told Congress May 20 that they were already preparing to modify the Qatari aircraft.

“As we lay out the plan, we will make sure that we do what’s necessary to ensure the aircraft is fit to carry the president with all the communications, safety, and self-defense measures required,” Meink told the Senate Armed Services Committee. The cost of modifying the jet is expected to be significant and could take years to complete, though officials have not revealed any specifics.

Meink said he would be “quite clear” with Trump and Hegseth if the gifted jet poses “any threats that that we are unable to address.”

Lawmakers and government watchdogs have raised ethical and legal concerns about the military’s decision to accept a free plane from a foreign country. News reports have suggested Trump wants to use the jet after he leaves office by having it donated to his presidential library. If new, the custom 747-8 would be valued at up to $400 million.

“Trump must seek Congress’ consent to take this $300 million gift from Qatar,” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) wrote on X May 11. “The Constitution is perfectly clear: no present ‘of any kind whatever’ from a foreign state without congressional permission. A gift you use for four years and then deposit in your library is still a gift (and a grift).”

Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, called the decision to accept the jet a “national embarrassment” in a May 21 statement.

“President Trump is outsourcing a core symbol of American sovereignty, power, and ingenuity,” Reed said. “He is forcing U.S. taxpayers to shell out potentially hundreds of millions of dollars to refurbish this so-called gift which will likely only be in official service for a short time.”

He argued that using the Qatari 747 is “reckless and would create unacceptable vulnerabilities for our nation.”

“There must be transparency and accountability about the costs of retrofitting this plane, the counterintelligence risks involved, and how it will be used once President Trump leaves office,” Reed said.

Boeing is already under contract to modify two unused 747-8s to ferry the president around the world. Meink said he’s unaware of any changes in requirements for the VC-25B program, the Air Force’s effort to replace the modified 747-200s that have served as Air Force One since the early 1990s.

Trump has expressed frustration with that program’s delays and has pushed for ways to receive a new plane sooner. Boeing was initially supposed to deliver the VC-25B in 2024 under a 2018 contract, but estimates for its introduction slipped to 2029, when Trump will no longer be in office. Boeing has incurred more than $2 billion in losses on the project and has cited labor shortages, especially among workers with security clearances, and supply chain issues as the cause of the delays. The Qatari plane has largely sat idle for years.

After public pressure from Trump, the Air Force now says it may be able to get the two Boeing-modified jets in service by 2027, though it has insisted it is not relaxing security requirements to do so. It has not offered a public timeline for modifying the Qatari 747.

More B-21s May Be Necessary If B-52J Upgrade Goes Awry, Allvin Says

More B-21s May Be Necessary If B-52J Upgrade Goes Awry, Allvin Says

The Air Force might want to buy more than the planned fleet of 100 B-21 Raider bombers, particularly if the coming B-52J upgrade proves more challenging than anticipated, Chief of Staff Gen. David W. Allvin told the Senate Armed Services Committee May 20.

If the B-52 modernization program “goes worse than we hope, then we would need more” money for B-21s, Allvin told Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.). When the senator asked if the Air Force’s plan for B-21s was “anywhere close” to what the service actually needed, Allvin replied that he would “take all I can get with the funding,” though he did not specify how many aircraft he wanted.

The B-52J upgrade consists of the Commercial Engine Replacement program (CERP) and Radar Modernization Program (RMP), both now underway, which seek to replace the engines and pylons of the entire 76-airplane B-52H fleet, along with its radar, some communications upgrades and other improvements—all to be delivered starting at the end of this decade. However, the upgrade faces headwinds.

The radar upgrade has resulted in a Nunn-McCurdy Act breach for exceeding projected costs, requiring the Air Force to assess and possibly reconfigure the program. The breach is considered “significant,” meaning there’s a 15 percent or more deviation from the base cost or schedule.

Allvin said the B-21 is an “incredible capability” that has gone “pretty well” so far in flight testing.

“The 100 minimum is certainly something we can stand behind,” he said. “When we look at what the maximum is, I really want to look at the risk over time, and opportunities over time.”

Allvin’s comments are an evolution from what he told the SASC last year. Previously, he said he was not inclined to go beyond 100 B-21s, saying that by the time all those aircraft are delivered, technology might have advanced to the point where the Air Force may want to shift to a different platform.

Recently, the commanders of U.S. Strategic Command and Air Force Global Strike Command have championed 145 B-21s as a new target.

In March, STRATCOM chief Air Force Gen. Anthony Cotton said 100 is an absolute minimum to buy, and that he’d be more comfortable with an accelerated rate of production. The current rate—classified, but believed to be only seven or eight per year—was “set when the geopolitical environment was a little bit different than what we face today,” with a rapidly growing Chinese strategic forces and Russia’s war in Ukraine and accompanying nuclear threats.

After questioning Allvin, Rounds, whose state will host some of the B-21 fleet, asked AFGSC boss Gen. Thomas A. Bussiere during a SASC subcommittee hearing on strategic forces if more B-21s are needed to cope with a world in which three nations have substantial strategic nuclear forces. The first B-21 base where the bomber will be operationally deployed is Ellsworth Air Force Base, S.D.

Bussiere replied that the fleet “could be as high as 145,” and he noted Cotton’s remarks to that effect this spring. Bussiere noted the 100 number was set around 2018 in a different strategic environment before the Pentagon had assessed that China’s nuclear forces are rapidly growing and Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

“I support assessing the increase of the production from 100 to 145,” Bussiere said. “But I think the real question for the Department [of Defense] and for the nation is, what’s the right mix of long-range strike platforms versus other strike platforms? It’s a reasonable question the nation has asked several times in the last year or two,” He said there are “ongoing efforts” in Congress and the DOD to “assess what the correct number of long-range strike platforms are in the Department of the Air Force.”

Bussiere said he is “pleased with the progress so far of the B-21 Raider platform,” and that the first test aircraft, known as T-1, is going through its paces at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. He noted aircraft are currently on the production line, though the number is classified.

Rounds said the B-21, to his knowledge, “is working, it’s on time, it’s on budget,” and that there is a lot of interest “to see B-21 come on at a higher rate than what’s currently planned for.”

Northrop Grumman chief executive officer Kathy Warden, on the company’s April 22 quarterly results call, said that Northrop took a $477 million charge on the B-21 to cover higher-than-expected materials costs, and changes to the manufacturing process that will allow for accelerating production, if the Air Force opts to do that.

The process change “positions us to ramp to the quantities needed in full-rate production,” Warden said, and will allow Northrop to “ramp beyond the quantities in the program of record.”

The House and Senate budget reconciliation package, agreed to last month but not yet signed into law, would provide $4.5 billion to accelerate the production of the B-21. However, no details were provided on the rate Congress wants or whether the number purchased would exceed 100 airplanes.

Trump Announces Plan For Golden Dome, Led By Space Force General

Trump Announces Plan For Golden Dome, Led By Space Force General

President Donald Trump wants his signature Golden Dome missile defense program to be up and running before the end of his term, he announced in the Oval Office May 20 alongside Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.

“I was really looking forward to this day, because this is very important for the success and even survival of our country,” Trump said. “It’s an evil world out there, so this is something that goes a long way towards the survival of this great country.”

Trump has tapped Space Force Vice Chief of Space Operations Gen. Michael A. Guetlein to lead the project, which is expected to heavily depend on satellites and other space-based technologies to track and stop incoming fire. Guetlein serves on a key council that oversees requirements for joint acquisition programs and previously ran Space Systems Command, the Space Force’s acquisition arm.

Trump said he wants to finish the project in “less than three years,” a much faster timeline than many analysts believe is needed to develop and field the technology, if Congress opts to fund it.

Golden Dome would become a “state-of-the-art system that will deploy next-generation technologies across the land, sea, and space, including space-based sensors and interceptors,” Trump said. The network aims to protect America from everything from drones to hypersonic weapons and ballistic missiles, threats which the country’s current defenses are too piecemeal, too limited in scope or not advanced enough to eliminate.

Space Force and defense officials have said Golden Dome will be a “system of systems,” rather than one big-ticket project. The most ambitious proposals call for space-based missile interceptors, a technology that has yet to be developed.

“This design for the Golden Dome will integrate with our existing defense capabilities and should be fully operational before the end of my term,” Trump said. “Once fully constructed, the Golden Dome will be capable of intercepting missiles even if they are launched from other sides of the world, and even if they are launched from space.”

He estimated putting the shield in place would cost about $175 billion—much lower than estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which said the program could cost $831 billion over the next two decades.

The administration will seek a $25 billion down payment on the first phase of Golden Dome in the Republican-led spending package, known as a budget reconciliation bill, advancing on Capitol Hill. Trump, Hegseth, and Guetlein did not offer details on which components may be funded first.

“We’ll have a big phase in very early,” Trump said. “We’re starting immediately.”

The project is reminiscent of former President Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative, announced in 1983. The U.S. spent billions of dollars on the endeavor but never produced the network of antimissile systems Reagan promised would make “nuclear weapons impotent and obsolete.” Proponents of Golden Dome say technology has advanced since then.

“We will truly be completing the job that President Reagan started 40 years ago, forever ending the missile threat to the American homeland,” Trump said.

But Trump acknowledged his proposal was a highly ambitious, so-called “super technology,” and, in some cases, theoretical.

“There really is no current system,” said Trump, before alluding to the U.S. nuclear arsenal as the nation’s primary current deterrent from attack. “This is something that’s going to be very protective. You can rest assured, there’ll be nothing like this. Nobody else is capable of building it, either.”

In testimony before Congress in March, Guetlein compared Golden Dome to the Manhattan Project. The Space Force’s No. 2 often warns of the new dangers America faces and defends the creation of a separate space-focused service and its niche capabilities.

“Our adversaries have become very capable and very intent on holding the homeland at risk,” Guetlein said. “Our adversaries have been quickly modernizing their nuclear forces, building out ballistic missiles capable of hosting multiple warheads, building out hypersonic missiles capable of attacking the United States within an hour and traveling at 6,000 miles an hour, building cruise missiles that can navigate around our radar and our defenses, building submarines that can sneak up on our shores, and, worse yet, building space weapons.”

USAF Has Started Planning for Qatari 747 to Enter Presidential Service as Air Force One

USAF Has Started Planning for Qatari 747 to Enter Presidential Service as Air Force One

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has directed the Air Force to start planning modifications to the 747-8 gifted to the U.S. by Qatar into a suitable presidential transport, Air Force Secretary Dr. Troy E. Meink told the Senate Armed Services Committee May 20.

The White House has said the jet will be ready for service as Air Force One before President Trump leaves office, or 2029.

“The Secretary of Defense has directed the Air Force to basically start planning to modify the aircraft,” Meink said during a Department of the Air Force posture hearing, his first testimony to Congress since being sworn in to the job May 16.

Under questioning from Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), who expressed numerous concerns about the security of the aircraft, Meink agreed that the Air Force will “have to look at all of those issues.” Duckworth was irked by the likely high cost of modifying the plane, given the president’s need to be in unquestioned instant contact with U.S. nuclear forces and conduct routine but highly secure communications with senior government officials.

But Chief of Staff Gen. David W. Allvin said the Air Force “will be postured to make the modifications necessary” to the former Qatari royal family’s aircraft to make it suitable for the president’s use. It wasn’t clear if that meant the service would be provided the funds to make the needed changes. Allvin and Meink testified alongside Chief of Space Operations Gen. B. Chance Saltzman in the annual Department of the Air Force fiscal 2026 posture hearing—a highly unusual occurrence as a budget has yet to be released.

Pressed by Duckworth to say how significant the changes needed will be, Meink said that “any civilian aircraft will take significant modifications” to be configured as a presidential transport. “Based on the secretary’s direction, we are postured, and we’re off looking at that right now; what it’s going to take,” he added.

Duckworth insisted that Meink commit to advising President Trump not to accept “cutting any corners” or “lower operational security” to get the aircraft in service on an accelerated timeline and said she is concerned that the two VC-25B 747-8 presidential transports already under construction have “had their requirements loosened” to accelerate delivery.

“I’m unaware of any requirement changes to the current program,” Meink responded. “And yes, we will, as we lay out the plan, we will make sure that we do what’s necessary to ensure” the aircraft is fit to carry the president with all the communications, safety, and self-defense measures required.

“I will be quite clear and discuss … with the secretary [and] the president … if we feel there’s any threats that that we are unable to address,” he said.

Boeing has been building two pre-owned, but never-operated 747-8s to serve as Air Force One, under a $3.5 billion contract awarded in 2018. Boeing has incurred more than $2 billion in losses on the fixed-price project and has cited labor shortages, especially the ability to get security-cleared workers, and supply chain issues as reasons for the delays. Industry observers have said it’s unlikely that the aircraft donated by Qatar could be modified quickly enough to be in service before the end of Trump’s tenure in office. The Defense Department has not yet explained how the 13-year-old ex-Qatari aircraft would be altered, whether there will be a competition to perform the modifications, or whether Boeing would be assigned the additional work.

The airplane in question has been largely idle for four years, as the Qatari royal family has attempted to sell it but found no buyers.

To meet the most-stringent requirements for the airplane, industry officials have said it might be necessary to strip the aircraft to its metal frame to ensure no spying or tracking devices are installed, and that the suite of self-defense, communications and engine power requirements needed to meet the demands of presidential safety would cost billions of dollars not now programmed into the Air Force’s budget.   

“Far from saving money, this unconstitutional action will not only cost our nation its dignity, but it will force taxpayers to waste over a billion …. taxpayer dollars to overhaul this particular aircraft, when we currently have not one, but two, fully operational and fully capable Air Force One aircraft,” Duckworth charged.

But, in any event, the Air Force must “protect all Americans from the dangers posed if the president’s sensitive communications are intercepted or if he is out of contact, God forbid, with our nation’s military during a crisis,” she said.

Space Force Losing 14 Percent of Civilian Workers as It Faces ‘Outsize Impact’ of Pentagon Job Cuts

Space Force Losing 14 Percent of Civilian Workers as It Faces ‘Outsize Impact’ of Pentagon Job Cuts

The Space Force, which ensures the U.S. military’s ability to operate in space, is facing a terrestrial challenge: a 14 percent cut to its civilian workforce. 

Chief of Space Operations Gen. B. Chance Saltzman flagged the problem in a May 20 Congressional appearance. 

“The civilian workforce by the end of ’25 was supposed to be almost 1,000 larger than it’s going to end up being,” Saltzman told the Senate Armed Services Committee. “Total reductions have been almost 14 percent of our civilian workforce inside the Space Force.”

The cuts are a result of the Trump administration’s broad push to shrink the number of civilians working for the defense establishment. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth issued a directive to trim the Department of Defense’s civilian workforce by five to eight percent by encouraging resignations and imposing a hiring freeze. 

But that plan is having a substantial impact on the Space Force, which was established in 2019 and is still in the process of getting its footing. Instead of anticipated growth in its workforce, the Space Force’s personnel have now shrunk significantly.

“We’ve certainly seen people leaving,” Saltzman said. “We were in a period of managed growth, and so there was a deficit when we were trying to get to a larger civilian workforce, and we were asked to stop and then offer some to resign early.” 

“We understand the desire to reduce the civilian workforce, [it is] just having a little bit of an outsized impact on the Space Force,” Saltzman added.

A Space Force spokesperson confirmed Saltzman’s figure of an approximately 14 percent reduction in civilian workers and said that the majority of the cuts came from those who opted into the so-called deferred resignation program and will be on paid leave through September of this year.

Civilians make up roughly a third of the Space Force. For fiscal 2024, the branch had around 5,200 civilian personnel and 9,400 Guardians.

“We rely heavily on our civilian workforce,” Saltzman said. “They bring expertise that we don’t have in Active-duty. They bring corporate continuity across all of our processes and procedures.”

Saltzman said the cuts will reduce the number of acquisition professionals in particular. In March, Lt. Gen. Philip A. Garrant, of Space Systems Command, which oversees the Space Force’s purchasing arm, said a “considerable number” of his employees had taken the resignation offer.

But the impact will be felt across the force, the service said.

“Reductions are proportionate to the job specialties and pay grades of the Space Force’s civilian workforce,” the Space Force spokesperson said.

What the Space Force will look like after the cuts is unclear.

“I’m not sure exactly where we’re going to end up [and] what our final size is going to be,” Saltzman said. “As soon as I understand what that size is, then we will redistribute and reallocate the civilian workforce as necessary.”

Air Force Reserve Pilots Short $26 Million for Flying Hours, Putting ‘Proficiency at Risk’

Air Force Reserve Pilots Short $26 Million for Flying Hours, Putting ‘Proficiency at Risk’

Air Force Reserve Command is running out of cash to give pilots the flying practice they need to stay ready for operations, the top Air Force Reservist told lawmakers.

“The flying hour program is at the foundation of our mission readiness and lethality,” Lt. Gen. John P. Healy told the House Appropriations Committee at a May 20 hearing. “However, the $145 million [operations & maintenance] mark full-year [continuing resolution] left us $26 million in the hole.”

That means the planned flying hour program will likely exhaust its funding by early September, “putting aircrew proficiency at risk,” he explained.

Across the Active, Reserve, and Air National Guard, the flying hour program indicates how much flying time crews need to safely operate aircraft. Inadequate flying hours reduces pilot proficiency and correlates with increased accident rates.  

Flying hours are a recurring challenge across the Air Force, which has seen its total flying time decline over the past few years. Two decades ago, the Air Force had about 1.6 million flying hours, but as the aircraft fleet aged and the pool of pilots and maintainers shrank, that number fell to 1.45 million in 2019 and 1.07 in 2024, a decline of 26 percent over five years.

In his written statement, Healy said the flying hour program is hampered by aircraft availability, which in turn is affected by limited spare parts, supply chain constraints, depot capacity, and delayed delivery of new aircraft such as the F-35, KC-46, HH-60W, and MH-139.

“As the [Air Force Reserve] recapitalizes its fleet and as aircraft availability improves, we are now faced with an underfunded flying hour program degrading both aircrew and maintenance proficiency and readiness,” he wrote.

It’s a reversal from last year’s problem, Healy said. In fiscal year 2024, AFRC had about 6,300 flying hours too many as the C-5 was recapitalized and a KC-46 squadron transferred to the Air National Guard.

The Air Force has struggled for years to match enough planes to pilots.

“If you gave more flying hour program funding, we wouldn’t be able to generate the sorties because we don’t have the flight line maintainers to generate them,” then-deputy chief of staff for operations Lt. Gen. James Slife said in 2023. “These things are all interconnected.” 

While simulators can keep some skills sharp, others require actual flying time. Senators flagged lack of stick time as a problem affecting pilot retention at a May 13 nomination hearing for the undersecretary of the Air Force for manpower and reserve affairs. 

“The fact that the Air Force had this process that took pilots out of the cockpit … was one of the major reasons for the loss of the pilots from the Air Force,” said Sen. Angus King (I-Maine).

The Biggest News from India-Pakistan Air Battle: the Kill Chain

The Biggest News from India-Pakistan Air Battle: the Kill Chain

The most important element of an air-to-air engagement in the recent India-Pakistan conflict may be how Pakistan integrated its Chinese-origin weapons and air defenses to shoot down at least one Indian Rafale fighter, an expert on the Chinese military said.

The effectiveness of the kill chain may have been more important than the capabilities of the specific fighters, said Michael Dahm, a senior fellow at AFA’s Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, who is an expert on Chinese military affairs.

Pakistan can “integrate ground radars with fighter jets and airborne early warning aircraft,” said Dahm. “The Pakistani Air Force deployed …’ A’ launched by ‘B’ and guided by ‘C’” and hit the target, he added, citing a May 12 report from China Space News, a Chinese defense industry magazine.

Speaking on a recent podcast, Dahm said the chain may have started with a Pakistani ground radar—“maybe a surface-to-air missile system, or some other type of radar system”—which “illuminated the Indian target.” Then, a Pakistani J-10C fighter “launched its missiles, probably at range, and finally, an airborne early warning and control aircraft used a midcourse datalink to update and guide the missile to the Indian fighter.”

It was a “long-range shot, beyond visual range,” likely using the export version of China’s PL-15 air-to-air missile, which Dahm said has an 80 nautical mile range.

The kill chain is the same kind the U.S. is attempting to create within and between its services through the Combined Joint All Domain Command and Control (CJADC2) concept.  

“When, and if, we do find out more about the details of the engagement, this may tell a story more about systems integration and how well Pakistan has done systems integration versus how well India has done systems integration,” Dahm said.

No details are available about where the Rafale was when it was hit, although Pakistani news agencies showed wreckage that may or may not have been the remains of an Indian Rafale on Pakistani territory. Pakistan claimed after the engagement that it had shot down five Indian aircraft—four fighters and a drone—which conducted an airstrike in Pakistan.

Pakistan seems to have very recently converted several Chinese airborne early warning and control aircraft into electronic warfare aircraft, Dahm said, but it’s unknown whether those aircraft were manipulating the electromagnetic environment. Pakistan’s radar systems and the J-10 are also Chinese in origin.

“What does this say about Chinese technology versus Western technology? Probably not a whole lot, but it probably says a lot more about systems of systems, about training, about tactics … about all of those difficult-to-quantify things,” rather than the relative capabilities of the J-10 versus the Rafale, Dahm said.

He also noted that while India’s air force is bigger than Pakistan’s, it includes “a hodgepodge” of Western, Israeli, Russian, and Indian-produced technology, which makes systems integration much more difficult.

Dahm said that while many news outlets are playing up the angle of the fourth-generation J-10C shooting down a fourth-and-a-half generation Rafale, the comparison of aircraft “probably tells us absolutely nothing.” It’s not known whether the Rafale was departing the target area or whether it had fired any missiles at the Pakistani aircraft, he said.

The Rafale was sold to India with the Meteor missile, which Dahm described as “a beast”—a solid-fueled ramjet missile with a top speed of Mach 4 and a range of 108 nautical miles—with a “wicked … no-escape zone.”

But “from the very, very limited reporting we have, there are no indications the Rafale was shot down with a Meteor missile still intact. They found the wreckage. There was a shorter-range [infrared] missile found in the wreckage, but there was no indication that the Meteor was there. Now, maybe the Rafale had a Meteor and it fired it. Maybe it wasn’t carrying one at all. But I don’t think this really tells us anything about how good the J-10 is compared to the Rafale, or how good the Chinese technology is compared to the Western tech.”