Rep. Norm Dicks (D-Wash.), staunch Boeing proponent in the heated KC-X tanker debate on Capital Hill, says the Defense Department will “favor a larger sized aircraft” in the revised solicitation that DOD plans to issue later this month or in August. In a statement issued by his office on July 9, Dicks makes the claim that Pentagon acquisition czar John Young told him that the updated criteria will assign “additional credit to a bigger plane.” This would seemingly put Boeing at a disadvantage since its KC-767 is comparatively smaller than Northrop Grumman’s KC-30 that is based on the Airbus A330 airframe. The KC-30 was chosen in the original contest, which is now being redone due to Boeing’s successful legal protest. “I am concerned that the department is trying to find a new way to justify selecting the larger Airbus tanker again, even though there is no current operational requirement for a larger refueling tanker,” writes Dicks, noting that he will oppose this idea.
As Air Force leaders consider concepts of operations for Collaborative Combat Aircraft, sustainment in the field—and easing that support by using standard parts and limiting variants—should be a key consideration, according to a new study from AFA's Mitchell Institute of Aerospace Studies.