The Air Force issued a statement yesterday emphasizing the rigorous process it has in place to select a KC-135 tanker replacement aircraft, noting that the evaluation team comprises “a broad spectrum of acquisition and operational professionals.” The service “hand-picked” some 150 experts, according to Terry Kasten, director of the unit at Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, responsible for the KC-X acquisition program, to scrub the contractor proposals—Boeing’s KC-767 and Northrop Grumman-EADS KC-30—and to conduct a legal review. Once they are done, their conclusions will go through an independent advisory council assessment before leading to a source selection authority decision and approval from the Defense Acquisition Board. Kasten also says he has “a direct line to senior Air Force legal and contracting advisors” that will help his team “ensure we do everything by the book.” After the failed Boeing tanker lease deal, the Air Force is under the gun to make this work. (For background: The Tanker Blame Game) USAF’s Program Executive Officer for Aircraft, Lt. Gen. Jack Hudson, noted that Air Force leadership has “ensured we proceed in a deliberate and transparent manner, every step of the way.”
The crash of a T-38 trainer jet this May—which caused a weekslong pause in flights across the fleet—was caused by an improperly installed pin for one of the jet’s horizontal stabilizers, according to a new accident report released Oct. 30. When the pin disengaged midflight, it created the slightest amount…