During his July 22 confirmation hearing to be Chief of Staff, Gen. Norton Schwartz responded to Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii), who questioned the need for the so-called interim bomber, saying: “The new bomber will enable us to maintain the capability to engage targets at a distance. And recognizing, again, the threat environment is likely to become more complex and more demanding, and thus we’ll need an airplane that’s properly designed to perform in that environment.” Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) wanted to know if the Air Force was still aiming for a 2018 date for the new bomber, since Pentagon acquisition boss John Young has stated recently that the date isnot necessarily a sure thing. “That is the plan, and if that is physically achievable, we will do so,” Schwartz said.
The U.S. military is maintaining a beefed-up presence in the Middle East, including fighters and air defense assets, following the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities June 22 and subsequent retaliation by the Iranians against Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar.
