This photograph shows the X-2 #2 (46-675) with a collapsed nose landing gear, after landing on the first glide flight at Edwards Air Force Base. The aircraft pitched at landing, slid along its main skid, and contacted the ground with the right wingtip bumper skid, causing it to break off. The nose wheel had collapsed upon contacting the ground. In the photo, Bell test pilot Jean Ziegler is still in the cockpit as ground crewmen stand by the aircraft. The X-2 #2 was subsequently destroyed in an explosion during captive flight on May 12, 1953, killing Ziegler and EB-50A crewmember Frank Wolko. NASA photo
Audio of this article is brought to you by the Air & Space Forces Association, honoring and supporting our Airmen, Guardians, and their families. Find out more at afa.org
“X” airplanes and missiles—flown by various combinations of military and civil organizations—have pushed the art of the possible in aerospace.
The term “X-plane” has been practically synonymous with cutting-edge aeronautical research since 1945. In that year, the Army teamed up with the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) to award Bell Aircraft Co. a contract to fabricate three aircraft. They were not to be prototypes of combat airplanes, but pure research craft, specifically designed to investigate flight faster than the speed of sound.
Designated XS-1 (for experimental, supersonic, and later simply X-1), these rocket-powered aircraft were the first to fly beyond Mach 1. Then-Capt. Chuck Yeager made the first supersonic flight on Oct. 14, 1947, just a couple of weeks after the Air Force became an independent military service.
The X-1 was closely followed by a wide variety of research craft that have become known as the X-planes. Not all of them were airplanes; some were missiles, some were hybrid air vehicles meant to fly both in air and space, some have been rotorcraft, and some uninhabited air vehicles. Sometimes a particular military service pursued these vehicles; sometimes in partnership with other services, or with NASA (the successor to NACA), and various incarnations of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).
While the initial aircraft in the X series focused on flying higher and faster, there soon followed craft that explored particular refinements of flight. These included airplanes with swept, forward-swept, and variable-sweep wings; airplanes with different-shaped wings or unusual control surfaces; new geometry for air inlets, aircraft with wings of different camber, or to explore laminar flow, shifting shock waves, or computer-aided flight controls. The purpose of these programs was to develop basic technologies that could make US aircraft—mainly military, some civil—more efficient, maneuverable, or otherwise more capable. A number explored a variety of approaches to vertical flight, and there were also gliders and craft that investigated technologies applicable to potential future spacecraft. One was to be nuclear powered. Some were secret, and many never even reached the hardware stage.
While some X-planes that explored rather esoteric technologies are practically unknown even to aviation fans, others have become part of the national consciousness.
Yeager’s X-1 flight made magazine covers months after the fact and was immortalized in the 1980 film, “The Right Stuff.”
The North American X-15 rocket plane competed with NASA’s Mercury program and made astronauts of a number of test pilots who flew to the edge of space, broke speed and altitude records for winged flight, and returned to a controlled landing on a runway.
The Boeing X-20 “Dyna-Soar” was the first attempt to develop a space shuttle-like capability (it was never flown, eclipsed by the Mercury program).
President Ronald Reagan featured the Rockwell X-30 National Aero-Space Plane program in his 1986 State of the Union address. The mention was meant to reassure America that US leadership in space would continue, coming only a week after the Challenger space shuttle disaster. Unfortunately, the planned single-stage-to-orbit craft, which Reagan dubbed the “Orient Express,” struggled because of immature technologies. It was canceled before flight hardware was built.
Boeing and Lockheed Martin, with the X-32 and X-35, respectively, vied to build the Joint Strike Fighter. Though fighter prototypes usually receive a YF nomenclature, the two airplanes earned their X designations by virtue of being the first jet-powered aircraft to take off conventionally, fly supersonic, and land vertically. Lockheed Martin won the competition, and its F-35 fighters are now equipping the US Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, and other countries’ militaries.
The Northrop Grumman X-47B made headlines by being the first unmanned autonomous aircraft to launch from an aircraft carrier via catapult and recover on the same ship using the arrestor cable system. The Northrop Grumman X-47B made headlines by being the first unmanned aircraft to launch from an aircraft carrier via catapult and recover on the same ship using the arrestor cable system.
The X-51 Waverider—a small unmanned vehicle that achieved 200 seconds of hypersonic speed—proved scramjet technologies were viable and paved the way for future US hypersonic efforts.
Not all experimental aircraft were labeled X-planes. The Air Force flew a large number of secret aircraft designed to test breakthrough military technologies. The Have Blue stealth demonstrator, for example, led to the F-117 Nighthawk attack aircraft. Other platforms that broke speed or altitude records bore different nomenclature, such as the Lockheed NF-104, adapted from surplus F-104Cs in the 1960s to train pilots for the presumed coming age of flight in both air and space.
The X-plane program has had its ups and downs, sometimes going years between new experiments, while at other times many were underway at once. The latest potential X-plane is being pursued by Lockheed Martin, with its Quiet Supersonic Technology aircraft. The aircraft is designed to muffle the hard sonic booms that accompany supersonic flight, often breaking windows and frightening animals. The new jet could make it feasible to develop supersonic aircraft that could fly over inhabited areas, potentially ushering in a whole new era of high-speed commercial flight. It has not yet been awarded an X designation.
Audio of this article is brought to you by the Air & Space Forces Association, honoring and supporting our Airmen, Guardians, and their families. Find out more at afa.org
The Space Force has added two startup firms to its National Security Space Launch program, increasing the competitive field for “commercial-like” missions to seven providers.
Just over a year after becoming the 27th Secretary of the Air Force, Troy Meink believes he’s making progress on his top priorities—increasing Air Force readiness, modernizing its aircraft fleet, and growing the nascent Space Force. In a June 26 interview with Air & Space Forces Magazine, Meink acknowledged headwinds but said the proof of his progress is in the fiscal 2027 budget now working its…
Since U.S. Air Force Gen. Alexus G. Grynkewich became NATO’s top military officer in July 2025, the alliance has contended with Russian drone incursions and hybrid warfare against its members and Moscow’s continued aggression in Ukraine. Now the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, a career fighter pilot, is trying to…
The U.S. carried out a series of fresh airstrikes against Iran on July 7 as the tenuous ceasefire between the countries again broke down over disputes over the Strait of Hormuz.
As President Donald Trump and other alliance leaders gather for the long-awaited NATO summit meeting in Turkey, a pressing question is how the alliance adapts as Europe seeks to replace long-standing American air warfare capabilities.
The Senate Armed Services Committee wants the Pentagon to study whether the unique legal issues arising from operations in space demand that the Space Force have its own lawyers.
The Air Force Point Defense Battle Lab is searching for more defense firms to demonstrate counter-drone capabilities at upcoming exercises designed to test base defenses against unmanned aerial attack.
Multiple delays have pushed the full-rate production decision on the T-7A Red Hawk back two years to 2029, the Government Accountability Office said in a new report. The assessment is another setback for the Air Force's next-generation trainer aircraft.
✓
Thank You!
Check your inbox to verify your email address and finish setting up your AFA account.
★
Welcome Back!
An account with this email already exists. Please log in to continue.
Subscribe to the Air & Space Forces Daily Report
The latest news from Air & Space Forces Magazine, as well as news from other leading publications, delivered right to your inbox every morning!
We’re sorry, there has been an error. Please review your input or try again later.