Talking with reporters at the Pentagon Tuesday, Sue Payton clarified the KC-X evaluation factors, saying price is not the most important part of the competition. The Air Force acquisition chief distributed a chart that shows cost/price is less important than mission capability, proposal risk, or past performance. She said the service deems cost as equal in importance to the integrated fleet air refueling assessment factor. Because the Air Force has a lot riding on its top acquisition priority, she declared that the service does not want to be bamboozled by unrealistic cost estimates. “Industry partners have a tendency to lowball” their cost proposals, Payton noted. The chart states explicitly that the other factors, collectively, “are significantly more important than Factor 4 [cost].”
The F-47 fighter will be run differently than previous fighter programs and share the same mission systems architecture as the Collaborative Combat Aircraft, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin told the Senate Armed Services Committee. That means advances in one will fuel advances in the other.