If the C-5 upgrade is going to require spending almost as much per airplane as buying new C-17s, then the nation should go with the C-17s, AMC chief Gen. Arthur Lichte told reporters in Washington Wednesday. The justification for hanging onto the C-5 has largely been that it can carry super-large, bulky stuff, but “there are not that many missions the C-17 can’t do that the C-5 can,” Lichte said. He added that it might make sense to forego the upgrade but retain some number of C-5s for those unique missions where only it can handle the job. The key, Lichte said, is “velocity.” He would prefer having to fly two C-17s, which can get a mission done with high reliability, rather than gamble on a single larger C-5 that “breaks along the way.” Is it critical to decide the fate of the C-5 reliability enhancement and re-engining program while the C-17 production line is still running hot? “Yes,” said Lichte.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth this week released strategies meant to focus the Pentagon’s “alphabet soup” of innovation organizations and proliferate artificial intelligence—moves that experts say could provide the structure needed to make the military’s efforts to integrate and field new technology more effective.
