The Army’s proposal to spend billions of dollars on 132 unmanned aerial vehicles in “the real world of limited resources and competing military needs” is wasteful, notes Defense Analyst Loren Thompson of the Lexington Institute. The Air Force currently keeps 85 percent of its Predator UAVs in the combat zone; the Army’s plan to tie UAVs to specific units would mean that at during any rotation of forces it would only have around 35 percent of its drones available. “It is hard to believe that the advantages of giving local commanders direct control over these vital intelligence-gathering tools outweigh being able to field an operational fleet that is so much bigger,” Thompson writes. He urges Army leaders to remember that “air space won’t always be so benign, and America’s soldiers are part of a joint team that must use scarce intelligence assets wisely.”
Small one-way attack drones widely used on the frontlines of Ukraine and against U.S. outposts in the Middle East have fundamentally altered the definition of air superiority, Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force Gen. James C. “Jim” Slife said April 24. "Our traditional conception of what things like…