According to the Congressional Budget Office, the Pentagon is behind in defining specific requirements for a new Long Range Strike platform, but it has speculated about eight “classes” of long-range weapons that might fill the bill. The eight include aircraft, long-range missiles, and space-based weapons, states the CBO in a new 60-page report that examines how well each would perform and the costs to develop them. Under the heading “arsenal aircraft,” we find the C-17 armed with a supersonic, long-range missile. There are also medium- and long-range subsonic and supersonic bombers and surface-based and space-based unmanned vehicles. One of the more obvious conclusions: The C-17 as an arsenal aircraft would be lower cost than a new bomber but very vulnerable to enemy air defenses.
The Space Force should take bold, decisive steps—and soon—to develop the capabilities and architecture needed to support more flexible, dynamic operations in orbit and counter Chinese aggression and technological progress, according to a new report from AFA’s Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies.
