James Jeffrey, a career foreign service officer who is now the senior adviser to the Secretary of State on Iraq matters, told defense reporters in Washington Tuesday that State is tracking violence in Iraq in a new manner—distinguishing between “effective” and “non-effective” attacks. While there has been an upsurge in violence and attacks in Iraq recently, he says that not as many have been effective since the mix is muddied by sectarian strife—a very distinct category from the insurgency. Jeffrey defined an effective attack as “any effort by any insurgent to take action” be that an improvised explosive device or a mortar round. He said there has been “a slight increase” in effective attacks, which are “by and large more professional” over the last few weeks, compared to the generalized attacks related to ethnic violence, which now appear to have leveled off since the bombing of the Golden Mosque in February.
The use of a military counter-drone laser on the southwest border this week—which prompted the Federal Aviation Administration to abruptly close the airspace over El Paso, Texas—will be a “case study” on the complex web of authorities needed to employ such weapons near civilian areas and the consequences of agencies…
