The Air Force’s notional MQ-X remotely piloted aircraft, the stealthy, modular successor to the MQ-9 Reaper, is in a holding pattern for now, Lt. Gen Bob Otto, deputy chief of staff for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, told Air Force Magazine. “We are waiting for requirements to be set by Air Combat Command,” although the “need is there” for such a platform in a timely fashion, he said following his June 9 speech in Arlington, Va., that AFA’s Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies sponsored. In his speech, Otto said there is “unease” among combatant commanders about the Air Force’s limited abilities to operate ISR assets in “contested airspace.” Asked if the Air Force might buy the Navy’s UCLASS platform as the MQ-X, Otto said the timing is awkward. The Air Force’s spending priorities are the F-35 fighter, KC-46 tanker, and Long Range Strike-Bomber, he said, with a T-X trainer and an E-8 JSTARS replacement also in line for funding for the next decade. Otto suggested something as elaborate as UCLASS, which is to be stealthy enough to survive against modern air defenses, might not be affordable with so many projects competing for acquisition dollars. (For more from Otto, read For Those Hard-to-Reach Areas.)
Pentagon leaders, eager to move fast and avoid pitfalls that have plagued defense acquisition in the past, are handing authorities and oversight for some of their biggest programs to officers outside the traditional structure. But the Air Force and Space Force four-stars given those responsibilities say they don’t intend their jobs to be a permanent change to the system.