It 
wouldn’t make much sense to make the new long range strike aircraft a conventional platform first, then add the nuclear capabilities later, US Strategic Command chief Gen. Kevin Chilton told the Daily Report, Monday at AFA’s Air & Space Conference in Washington, D.C. Downscoping the aircraft’s capability from all-up nuclear to conventional would be far cheaper than the other way around. Adding in the nuclear hardening “on the back end”—heavily affecting design and development and forcing major rework of the configuration—would be very expensive, Chilton said, “I would be opposed to that.” Far easier, he said, to design the aircraft as a nuclear platform first, then get busy testing conventional weapons fit while the B-2 and B-52 are still available to carry the nuclear weapons. Air Force Secretary Michael Donley said earlier in the day that the LRS will focus on conventional missions first.
Pentagon Releases Cost of Living, BAH Rates for 2026
Dec. 30, 2025
The Pentagon will pay cost of living allowances to 127,000 service members in the continental U.S. in 2026, an increase of 66,000 members in 2025. Airmen and Guardians across the U.S. will also receive an average increase of 4.2 percent for their Basic Housing Allowance, compared to the 5.4 percent…
