Rep. Norm Dicks (D-Wash.) and Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.) and 123 other lawmakers signed a
letter to President Obama last week, urging him to stand behind the US government's long-stated argument that "European governments illegally subsidized the development of Airbus aircraft," states the letter. In a joint
statement with Dicks, Tiahrt said the current Pentagon position—
essentially ignoring the World Trade Organization's interim ruling—is "unacceptable" and Dicks agreed, adding that "it is difficult to explain how the Pentagon can ignore the obvious implications for the tanker contract." Dicks and Tiahrt are ardent Boeing supporters in the KC-X tanker competition against the Northrop Grumman-EADS team. (EADS is parent to Airbus.) Dicks, Tiahrt, et al conclude, "When the WTO's final ruling in this matter confirms US claims that Airbus products were illegally subsidized, we will be committed to ensuring this principle is upheld."
The 2010 defense appropriations bill, now on its way to the President (see below), prohibits the Air Force from carrying out its plan to retire early some 250 legacy fighters pending April 1 delivery of the results of an independent review conducted by a federally funded research and development center. Use of an independent review takes the matter a step beyond Congressional calls for USAF to simply divulge more details of its legacy fighter plans, particularly as regards the air sovereignty alert mission. (The bill still directs USAF to provide details.) The bill also requires USAF to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of its plan to shift F-15 training from Tyndall AFB, Fla., to the Oregon Air National Guard's Kingsley Field. The service had wanted to advance that move to early 2010—now that plan is delayed until at least April.