How Quickly We Forget: Policy wonks at Congressional Research Service in a March 16 report to Congress offer an overview of current tactical aviation plans and analysis—more of a point-counterpoint recitation of views—about “key issues.” The issues, per CRS, include one called “service roles and missions,” which concludes with this point: The war in Afghanistan in 2001 “highlighted the importance of carrier-based aviation.” We disagree, considering that 70 percent of the ordnance dropped came from USAF bombers. And, carrier-based fighters were no less dependent on aerial refueling than were USAF fighters when it came to fighting over land-locked Afghanistan. (Read our July 2002 article “In Defense of Fighters.”)
A new report from the Government Accountability Office calls for the Pentagon’s Chief Technology Officer to have budget certification authority over the military services’ research and development accounts—a move the services say would add a burdensome and unnecessary layer of bureaucracy.
