When setting requirements for a next-generation bomber, USAF should emphasize its conventional role, with the nuclear mission a distant second place. That’s the view of Barry Blechman, a member of DOD’s Defense Policy Board and president of DFI International. Blechman told the National Defense University Foundation today that strikes against terrorists and rogue states call for conventional capabilities, not nuclear ones. High costs of development and maintaining nuclear weapons are a drawback, he said. Blechman added that he does not consider it consider it risky to de-emphasize the nuclear role, because USAF seemingly finds its B-52s and a few nuclear-capable B-2 bombers sufficient for the task.
The Air Force wants to “own and run” more of its air bases, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Kenneth S. Wilsbach said Nov. 6, in what could be a major potential revamp the military’s joint base program. Speaking at the Airlift/Tanker Association’s 2026 Symposium, Wilsbach said he and the…