“NATO is a relic that remains relevant,” said Hans Binnendijk, senior fellow at the SAIS Center for Trans-Atlantic Relations, on Sept. 17 at AFA’s 2013 Air and Space Conference in National Harbor, Md. The alliance has “been fairly flexible, adjusting … to new realities” after the Sept. 11 attacks, he said and added that NATO has been able to stay relevant by shifting its focus. When asked his thoughts about how relevant the United States is in NATO today, Binnendijk said that most European countries would answer, “Without the US, there would be no alliance.” He countered, however, “you’re going to get different answers” about needed capabilities depending on which country you ask. He explained that countries in southeastern Europe want the United States to do more about missile defense, whereas Poland would want boots on the ground.
The U.S., South Korea, and Japan flew an unusual trilateral flight with two U.S. B-52H Stratofortress bombers escorted by two Japan Air Self-Defense Force F-2s, and two ROK Air Force KF-16 fighters—both countries’ respective variants of the F-16—July 11. That same weekend, the top military officers of the three nations…