With the drawdown in Iraq and Afghanistan, the United States should re-evaluate its strategy for operating in the Persian Gulf, asserts a new Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments report. The proliferation of Iran’s anti-access and area-denial capabilities threatens long-held assumptions that the United States will continue to “enjoy unfettered access to close-in bases, US battle networks would remain intact and secure, and neither the Soviet Union nor a regional power would pose a serious threat to air or sea lines of communications,” reads Outside-In: Operating from Range to Defeat Iran’s Anti-Access and Area-Denial Threat, which CSBA released on Tuesday. CSBA senior fellow Mark Gunzinger argues in the report that the United States should develop a new Persian Gulf operational concept. It should assume “that close-in basing may not be available, all operating domains will be contested, and Iran may threaten terror and [weapons of mass destruction] attacks, including the use of nuclear weapons, to deter or prevent a successful US military intervention in the Persian Gulf,” he wrote.
NASA Boss: Race to Moon Has National Security Stakes
Sept. 15, 2026
NASA is pushing hard to get astronauts back to the moon by 2028—and the urgency is driven in no small part by the national security implications of doing so before China does, Administrator Jared Isaacman said Sept. 15.
