Although USAF acquisition chief Sue Payton claimed that the service had worked closely with each offeror in the tanker contest to resolve questions and ambiguities, the service added a significant change in the final request for proposals, Boeing tanker VP Mark McGraw said in a teleconference with reporters Tuesday (see above). The change involved revising a model that pitted each tanker against a series of real-world scenarios. When Northrop Grumman’s KC-30 apparently couldn’t complete some of the missions—which would have given it “a zero” in those scenarios, McGraw charged—the Air Force adjusted the scenarios to allow the KC-30 to show better. Included among several tweaks to the model were adjustments that gave some overseas runways ramp space that doesn’t really exist and cutting in half the requirement for spacing between aircraft so more KC-30s could fit, McGraw said. The Air Force did not note the changes when the final RFP was released; Boeing had to “find them” on its own.
The Air Force awarded a $13.08 billion contract to the Sierra Nevada Corporation on April 26 for its Survivable Airborne Operations Center aircraft, the successor to the service’s E-4B “Doomsday” plane. Like the E-4B, officially called the National Airborne Operations Center, the SAOC will be meant to withstand a nuclear attack and keep…