Both competitors for the Air Force’s KC-X tanker replacement program gathered panels of retired Air Force officers this week at AFA’s Air & Space Conference to extol the virtues of their aircraft. The Boeing panel argued that the 767 is the right size for the runways to be encountered and more fuel efficient than the larger Northrop Grumman-EADS North America KC-30. The Northrop panel argued that the KC-30 can carry more fuel to offload and more cargo and passengers to fulfill the tanker’s alternate role as an airlifter. Both arguments have been heard before. The Air Force has a tough decision that is expects to make by year’s end. Then it’s on to the next increments, the KC-Y and KC-Z.
Building satellites is hard enough on Earth, but a group of companies just received a contract from the U.S. Space Force that could pave the way to building satellites in orbit. Announced March 20, the goal of the $1.6 million award is to demonstrate building a standalone satellite on Earth…