House Armed Services readiness subcommittee members are questioning whether the Pentagon’s new National Security Personnel System, authorized by Congress in 2004, was the right approach—and collectively seem to think the NSPS needs to be fixed through additional legislation. A big stumbling block has been efforts to incorporate the Defense Department’s union employees—efforts that have faced continued legal challenges. At a March 6 hearing, John Gage, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, complained that the Pentagon rebuffed union efforts to work out differences, saying, “DOD made clear they simply wanted unlimited authority with no effective outside review.” Business and labor negotiation expert Marick Masters, said that DOD was “moving in the right direction” in its pay for performance effort but had failed miserably on the labor relations aspect, developing a plan that “eviscerates collective bargaining.”
Three of four congressional committees with influence over defense policy have voted to change the official name of the Department of Defense to the Department of War—but final approval of the Pentagon rebrand is months away and not yet assured.