The Air Force explanation left many Congressmen still in the dark. Rep. Jim Saxton (R-N.J.), for one, said that “five minutes” was not enough time to have a “real discussion” on this issue. Whereupon Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.), House Armed Services Committee Chairman, said he would schedule an “informal” session in the next week or so “to really talk this thing through.” Discussion did not end there, though. Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-Calif.) flatly stated that she did not understand “why the President’s Budget doesn’t fund the extra C-17s.” To which, Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne replied, “The problem is actually not on us this year. … It’s a direction … that we’re stuttering around with.” And, then he added, “The actual [production line] closure doesn’t occur until FY ’08, so, we’re anxious but we’re not panicked.”
The Air Force wants to pump more than $12 billion over the next five years into its new affordable long-range missiles program and recently asked industry to push the flights of some of those munitions beyond 1,200 miles.